<p>
</p>
<p>That depends on how the technology is developed. If the reader had a touch screen… Obviously that would cost a lot more.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>That depends on how the technology is developed. If the reader had a touch screen… Obviously that would cost a lot more.</p>
<p>It’ll be cheaper for the state, lighter for students to carry, easily accessible, and with modern improvements in battery life, this would only get better. </p>
<p>Buying one may be sorta expensive, assuming Kindle price, but it’ll be an equivalent investment to a graphing calculator and several AP test costs. </p>
<p>I think its a wonderful idea.</p>
<p>Bad idea
<p>I’m assuming it would be some type of purpose-made reader, rather than computer based. The latter would be awful; the former would take some getting used to but has clear benefits in addition to cost.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I’m assuming this wouldn’t be an option.</p>
<p>[EDIT: there seems to be a complete lack of clarity on what this plan entails, and that’s why I think it will be a reality later rather than sooner, if at all.]</p>
<p>I hate reading huge blocks of text, the kind found in almost every textbook, on a monitor.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Does such a reader even exist? Even if it did, it adds on the reader expense and possible repairs (you see how kids toss around crap in their backpacks/lockers, think it’ll be any different with this?)</p>
<p>I think that there are readers like that, and a large investment would increase the quality and affordability greatly. I’m not necessarily strongly for it though, like I said above. Your other concern was among the questions I posed above.</p>
<p>
</p>