<p>
</p>
<p>Sorry…They shouldn’t have to teach for a national/state test.</p>
<p>AP classes: it’s understood when you take an AP class what you will be studying for. Plus, if you are that advanced, I’m not too worried at that point.</p>
<p>Junior year classes for the ACT: I never did this. </p>
<p>Classes in general for the Final exam: YES, but if the teacher makes the exam or if the exam isn’t too restrictive/isolated in what they test, the teachers will have flexibility.</p>
<p>Classes in general for a state standardized exam: This is the one that tends to be the problem.</p>
<p>Everything we do in school is for a test: This way of thinking is problematic.</p>
<p>FROM WIKI: Problems with standardized tests</p>
<p>Critics have argued that the focus on standardized testing (all students in a state take the same test under the same conditions) as the means of assessment encourages teachers to teach a narrow subset of skills that will increase test performance rather than focus on deeper understanding that can readily be transferred to similar problems.[30] For example, if the teacher knows that all of the questions on a math test are simple addition equations (e.g., 2+3=5), then the teacher might not invest any class time on the practical applications of addition (e.g., story problems) so that there will be more time for the material which is assessed on the test. This is colloquially referred to as “teaching to the test.”</p>
<p>Moreover, many teachers who practice “teaching to the test” actually misinterpret the educational outcomes the tests are designed to measure. On two state tests (New York State and Michigan) and the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) almost two-thirds of eighth graders missed math word problems that required an application of the Pythagorean theorem to calculate the distance between two points.[31] Wiggins and McTighe blamed the low success rate on teachers who correctly anticipated the content of the tests, but incorrectly assumed each test would present rote knowledge/skill items rather than well-constructed, higher-order items.</p>
<p>The practice of giving all students the same test, under the same conditions, has been accused of inherent cultural bias because different cultures may value different skills. It also may conflict with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), which states that schools must accommodate disabled students.[32] For example, it is normally acceptable for visually impaired students to be read test material aloud. However, on a NCLB-mandated test, a group of blind students had their scores invalidated (reported as zeros) because the testing protocol did not specifically allow for test readers to speak.[33]</p>
<p>The practice of determining educational quality by testing students has been called into question.[34]</p>