<p>I think this is a wonderful policy. In my many AP classes in high school, I only ever saw... 3 black students, probably no hispanics, if I remember correctly. So this is about 3 urms out of enough AP classes to prepare me for 12 AP exams in my ~25% black high school. Everyone on this forum complaining about affirmative action should be happy about this policy, because this is a truly sensible way to at least make a stab at dealing with racial inequality in our society. </p>
<p>I understand why some people have reservations about the plan, but I think it's important to remember that this isn't binding, it's simply a award to create an incentive for schools to try to do this. I'm not even sure if there's any money attached, but it's pretty clearly not something that will force a school to fulfill this goal if they have good reasons not to. This won't be "forcing people to take AP tests," as Conker suggests, merely encouraging some people who might not ordinarily give it much thought to try them.</p>
<p>Yeah, I'm basically responding to conker, because I think (he? she?) has some reasonable, but flawed criticism, so let's address some other stuff in (his? her?) post. There certainly are deeper social problems that education policy can't directly address, but this at least does cut reasonably deep into the issue. Yes, many minority students do have bad influences growing up, and yes, some people do work 8 hours a day to supplement family income, but the latter are a minority, and bad experiences growing up should not disqualify someone from future success. It's tough to overcome a bad early grounding in academics, but it can be done, and it has to start somewhere. And with the way high school curricula are set up today, there are artificial barriers imposed by school administrations beyond just a lack of a strong understanding of basics. I don't mean to imply that schools have racist policies to prevent minorities from succeeding, but rigid tracks of classes do, in my opinion, have a de facto effect of limiting minority and poor white student access to higher educational opportunities. Students in higher performing tracks will have more academic opportunites. That's a necessity in any school system with varying levels of competency among students. The problem is that there's often very limited mobility between these tracks. Once a student is placed in the lower track, the administration often does not make it easy to get out. So who gets placed in the higher tracks? 1: people who were star students early in their lives and place into it, and 2: people who are willing and able to fight a little bit to get into them. 1 will by and large not be people with troubled backgrounds who might, by the time high school has rolled around, have matured, and developed a greater interest in academics. 2 will consist primarily of people who understand why these classes are important (generally, have educated parents), think they can succeed in these classes (generally, have educated parents or smart peers; I think people who could succeed in these classes are often scared away because they're so foreign and people make them out to be incredibly difficult), and, in some cases, have parents who are willing and able to fight against to school administrations to get their kids past arbitrary rules into the classes where they need to be. The realities of the socioeconomic situation of URMs in the U.S. are certainly the primary reason why so few URMs are in advanced classes, but some blame certainly does fall on the way public education is run as well. This policy will help encourage schools somewhat to allow and encourage mobility into these upper tracks, even if interested students may not seem very likely to receive top scores (hence only 30% pass rate required), which will help remove this artificial barrier to minority success in AP classes. It's a small step, but worthwhile. </p>
<p>And besides, even if it doesn't make a huge difference, what harm can it cause? I don't really see much in the way of drawbacks to what is essentially a pat on the back for some succesful schools.</p>