<p>"
I usually enjoy your posts, but your attitude here shocking, insulting, and really bizzare. Yes, some schools can be bad fits for certain kids, but blaming the school for your S’s choices about partying/not going to class (I’m assuming there’s plenty of kids who did go to class) is just… well, I have no words."</p>
<p>I’m not blaming the school. I know that my son made a choice to party and flunk out. The school didn’t force him to do such things. </p>
<p>I think, however, that if my son had been at a higher caliber school in which students valued their academics more and the quality of education were higher, there would have been better chances that S would have still passed his classes despite partying, and wouldn’t have left school never to return by age 25.</p>
<p>My viewpoint is based on the fact that until he went to college, S had always taken pride in meeting academic challenges such as getting the IB diploma and staying in the IB magnet program even though he didn’t like school.</p>
<p>I went to an Ivy. Students certainly partied there, including me. In fact, I was on academic probation during freshman year due to partying and skipping class.</p>
<p>However, students rarely flunked out or dropped out permanently because the high graduation rate and the high academic motivation of most of the students meant that there was pressure from peers to stay in college even if that meant doing a lot of cramming at the last minute. I never met any students at my Ivy who thought that flunking out was a joke or who thought would be fun to stretch out their experience as long as possible by changing majors and flunking classes just to avoid entering the real world.</p>
<p>I also didn’t know any students at my Ivy who chose it only because they were big sports fans of the school, yet S was in a school that students chose because of partying, and where many students did think it was fine to use any means to stretch out their college so they could avoid the real world. </p>
<p>Where S went, there was only a 60% graduation rate, so for a freshman to get bad grades and flunk out was considered typical behavior, not something deviant and embarrassing.</p>
<p>S-- who was a whiz at the school newspaper at his college – also entered as an academic star with scores far higher than the norm. Older students looked up to him due to his intelligence and journalism skills. All of this resulted in him thinking that basically he was too smart for college. I doubt that this would have happened at a top college. </p>
<p>He would have been surrounded by students who were doing extraordinarily well in their ECs as well as their classwork, and many of the students would have given him a run for the money in terms of their intelligence and skills and their ability to party while getting their academic work done. The classes also would have challenged him more than he experienced at the college that he chose.</p>
<p>I think that given his competitive nature, there’s a good chance that he would have risen to their level by making it a priority to at least pass his academics while doing well in his ECs.</p>
<p>Some students will challenge themselves and achieve no matter where they are planted. That, however, did not appear to be the case for my son, which, frankly, was a surprise to me.</p>