<p>Oh I just want to choke on that. It appears to help “diversity” students only because many of the ones recruited started at crummy public schools before BS. If you break out the more wealthy subset, you’ll see no difference between their matriculation and their equalliy well-heeled white counterparts.</p>
<p>Going to BS doesn’t hurt if you’re not a so-called “diversity” candidate. The problem is that many people come in with the “expectation” that going to BS is an automatic entree to top schools then fail to develop the other characteristics those schools are looking for. It’s not just about the classes, it’s about how the student took advantage of the total experience and what personal growth came out of it.</p>
<p>I was telling my daughter about an MIT interview a few years ago. I drove an hour from Boston to interview on campus. My last interview didn’t show up on time. But I love sitting in the library so I grabbed a book and relaxed rather than rush back during prime traffic jam time. About 90 minutes later I was leaving when a young boy, came running up the steps breathless and dressed in gym clothes. He apologized profusely and said he had a Squash match he’d forgotten. So I agreed to stay and do his interview. It came out that this was not a varsity, JV or even intramural game, but in fact a game he promised to play with a dorm friend. I encounter similar attitudes but those students are the first to think their lack of diversity was a factor in their rejection.</p>
<p>I talk to a wide range of students (most white) and what comes through is a subset of students who have not experienced challenge, struggle, and who demonstrate no knowledge of the college beyond it’s prestige. Those are the ones who complain (or whose parents complain) bitterly that they were bypassed for some one who had a “hook.” Never mind the kid that was given the spot worked two jobs while struggling with school and was white AND head of SADD. Or was white and managed to volunteer at a local shelter and earned an Eagle Scout award. Or was at BS and did volunteer projects outside of what the school offered, or rode a unicycle, or solved a problem the school struggled with, or directed the play - or just plain earned the respect of the faculty in the way that another student did not.</p>
<p>The best “hook” is not color or economic status. It is proving you can add to the student body in a positive way, that you’ve taken full advantage of your opportunities, that you’ve experimented with different things, have a passion, and can get out of your comfort zone.</p>
<p>BS is a hook in that if the curriculum is rigorous, the college knows the student won’t struggle with adjustment to coursework (a major issue for many incoming Freshmen).</p>
<p>Mood killers - If the parent is in the background (other than a mild supportive role) - it’s a negative. Helicopter parents (or the hint of one) has killed many applications around the country. Even if the parent is well meaning. When my oldest was applying to college I pointed out that I wasn’t a helicopter parent and the Adcom and counselor laughed and said "the fact that you know what that means give you high marks in our book). That isn’t dissimilar to my joking with a BS Adcom who interviewed kid #2 that I was going to buy a condo close to the school and she said "you have no idea how many parents say that and are serious!)</p>
<ol>
<li><p>Students who have no passion, no long term hobby, or a non academic interest to talk about.</p></li>
<li><p>Students who don’t read outside of classroom assignments - or claim they read for pleasure but can’t give a synopsis of the book they read. </p></li>
<li><p>Students following in their parents footsteps but having done nothing independent to validate the choice.</p></li>
<li><p>Students who rattle off a list of accomplishments so generic they’re hard to distinguish from other applicants.</p></li>
<li><p>Students who are perfectly nice kids but don’t stand out - or worse, are so quiet in an interview it’s hard to tell who wants the college more - them or their parents.</p></li>
</ol>
<p>etc.</p>
<p>So I would wonder if the trend is often those unsuccessful students are too similar to the general pool, or to complacent that BS has already laid the groundwork.</p>
<p>As someone on another thread joked about BS volunteer opps - there are now more toilets in a poor community than people given how many students use it as their sole source of extracurricular volunteer work. My husband sighs at how many med school applicants think naming ER, Gray’s Anatomy, and other medical shows as evidence of their passion for the field is a plus but have never EVER spent time working with, or volunteering for, or shadowing someone in the profession. Or give generic answers such as wanting the chance to help humanity when the next applicant comes in with a discussion of their science fair experiment showing real passion for the biomedical field.</p>
<p>Does that make any sense? Boarding school doesn’t hurt a student’s chances unless it’s clear the student didn’t really maximize the opportunities available. And supplement them with opportunities outside of campus. Didn’t travel. Didn’t lead a team. Didn’t try something new. Didn’t fail at something then get back up and try again or try something else. Or didn’t…(fill in the blanks)</p>
<p>The current trend is that most competitive schools are looking for leaders, problem solvers and innovative thinkers, not students who have to be lead. These days the pools are huge the onus is on the student to figure out how to “fit” and “stand out” in a crowd.</p>