Does a short interview mean a bad interview?

<p>I just got back from my Penn interview, and I thought it went really well. We had a lot in common, had a great converstion, and I feel that I presented myself very well and I was able to talk about all that I wanted to. I feel that she has a good feeling of who I am, what I want to do in the future, and why I want to go to Penn/how I would do there. She seemed to like me, and she said that I would do very well at penn and that my personality/ambitions are perfect for Penn.</p>

<p>However the interview only lasted 30 minutes. Is this bad? My other one for a different school lasted for a little over an hour, but I feel like this one went better! Any opinions? :o</p>

<p>I just had my interview. It was also the shortest one I've done, but I feel like we connected well and that it was the best one I've done so far. I woudl say if she told you you are perfect for penn, 30 minutes is not bad!</p>

<p>as long as they got enough about you in those 30 mins, then you're fine.</p>

<p>Good. that makes me feel better. Afterall, it is quality over quantity, right? ;) Thanks!</p>

<p>30 min from wht ive heard is the normal time for an interview. it seems like u said everything u wanted to so 30 min of good concentrated info is better than a longer time with akward silence lol mine happened to last for like an hour and a half but tht was just cuz we were talking about random stuff, not connected to college or nething. dont worry about it, if it was a nice convo thts all tht matters</p>

<p>if you stuck on topic 30 minutes will more than cover all you need. my yale interview lasted 2 hours cause we went totally off topic and talked about astronomy, civilizations, theoretical physics, chemistry, food and migration being related to religion, why certain civilizations were wiped out by others, why certain animals were domesticated, blah blah. i havent been contacted for my penn interview.</p>