<p>Does any one know , of all the applicants how many were accepted, deferred or Rejected?</p>
<p>[MIT</a> Early Action Decisions Now Available Online | MIT Admissions](<a href=“http://mitadmissions.org/blogs/entry/mit-early-action-decisions-now-available-online]MIT”>MIT Early Action Decisions Now Available Online | MIT Admissions)</p>
<p>680 accepted = 11.3%
3731 deferred = 62.1%
1308 = 21.8%
Rest were withdrawn or incomplete.</p>
<p>my goodness, I’ve never heard of a school deferring that percentage of applicants ^^ RD is going to be very competitive this year.</p>
<p>Oops, that 1308 is supposed to say “not admitted” next to it.</p>
<p>I believe they actually deferred like a percentage point less than last year. (Same with the number of admits) </p>
<p>They may have also “not admitted” more people than last year percentage wise, but I can’t tell because they don’t specifically list that on their statistics page (I’m not sure how many were withdrawn/incomplete last year).</p>
<p>wow so many deferrs!!</p>
<p>
These are actually very typical numbers for MIT EA – not unusual in the least.</p>
<p>Does anyone know the acceptance rate for athletic recruits who apply EA?</p>
<p>^Those statistics aren’t typically released separately. Last year, overall (for both EA and RD), about 30% of art/music/athletic “stars” were admitted.</p>
<p>Slight correction, mollie. About 30% of last years class were composed of art / music / athletic stars, not a 30% admit rate for them.</p>
<p>Oh, my misunderstanding.</p>
<p>EDIT: I think we have both confused ourselves. 
From [this</a> thread](<a href=“http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/massachusetts-institute-technology/882019-statistics-mit-2014-admissions-cycle.html]this”>http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/massachusetts-institute-technology/882019-statistics-mit-2014-admissions-cycle.html) last year.</p>
<p>Yep, you’re right. D’oh!</p>