<p>A low yield would be nice. 
Hopefully we will hear good news about yield by the end of next week.</p>
<p>Yes I really appreciate the fact that MIT allows the general public to access their libraries without any paperwork or anything. Universities should make efforts to make their material free to the public if they can without too much effort (like OCW).</p>
<p>actually, i know: </p>
<p>4 people that got into Harvard- only 1 is going.
5 people that got into mit- 4 are going
2 got into yale - none are going
1 got into princeton - not going
2 people that got into stanford - none are going</p>
<p>so, at least for “my” anecdotal data, MIT is doing pretty good :P.</p>
<p>however, I do think that it’ll stay about the same for all HYPSM.</p>
<p>Latest HYPSM cross-admit data tabulated at CC:</p>
<p><a href=“http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/1064804661-post245.html[/url]”>http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/1064804661-post245.html</a></p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I wouldn’t even give a ***** about this. I entered around 10 of my other cross-admitted friends’ stats who mostly did not choose Stanford. The OP named ewho would not enter the data in it apparently because most of my friends I entered did not choose Stanford (her son chose Stanford over Yale) but she wanted him to choose Yale.</p>
<p>so many flaws : not a simple random sample, selection bias etc.</p>