<p>
</p>
<p>If the redistribution of wealth is such a bad idea in Texas, what would a better alternative be? Wealthy people are not happy. Poor people are not happy.</p>
<p>If the richer districts are allowed to keep all their revenues, what is the solution for the current beneficiaries? Do we expect to do more with less?</p>
<p>According to a study, the poorer districts have a higher property tax rate: " The poorest school districts (10 percent) average a school property tax rate of $1.14 and get $5,530 per student while the wealthiest school districts (10 percent) average a $1.01 tax rate and get $8,316 per student."</p>
<p>The difference in funding translates directly in a worse education:</p>
<p>[Poorest</a> school districts get least-qualified teachers; affluent districts get the best, survey f…](<a href=“http://www.star-telegram.com/2010/10/18/2556603/poorest-school-districts-get-least.html]Poorest”>http://www.star-telegram.com/2010/10/18/2556603/poorest-school-districts-get-least.html)</p>