<p>I didn't attend boarding school, but I went to college with a fair number of students who did. I don't know lbftw's posting history, but his point is, in my experience, a fair (if rather strongly stated) one:</p>
<p>
[quote]
there are plenty of boarding school kids who come in, have no idea how to control themselves and end up ****ing up royally. conversely, there are many kids from average or below-average high schools who are highly motivated and hit the ground running.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>The boarding school kids I knew in college were just as diverse a group of people as the rest of the students. Some of them came in and messed around, some made seamless transitions, and most fell somewhere in the middle. Some were incredibly mature, a few may never be mature. </p>
<p>So, how big of a role did boarding school play in all of this? Impossible to generalize. For some of the kids, we can assume that they really knew how to look after themselves, take responsibility for their own actions, manage their time, and so forth, and we can credit that to their years spent boarding. But then, they've got the latch-key, naturally mature, and/or highly organized NON-boarding school kids right there with 'em, as well as kids who were in charge of lots of younger siblings, who spent every HS summer away from home at various programs, who developed great time management skills from sports or particularly intense HS schedules, or who, in general, picked up the very same skills/maturity-levels elsewhere. And on the other hand, as ahhhcollege says, freedom from strict boarding rules can cause a boarding school student to go as 'crazy' in college as any other kid who's experiencing newfound 'freedom' and independence. There are other kids who are going to go a little bit crazy at college simply because it's college, regardless of how they spent their HS years. In other words, I think that a boarding school background can be given as the justification of many different college behaviors; conversely, every particular college behavior can be explained in many different ways.</p>
<p>I imagine it's easy for the boarding school kids who've had easy transitions to credit the fact to their HS experiences. It makes perfect sense. And of course, there are plenty of college freshman who didn't come from boarding schools but are still handling college life just fine...they don't attract any attention because they're not making trouble. The comparison in the original post really isn't between "boarding school kids" and "non-boarding school kids." The comparison is between some particular boarding school kids who feel that they've made smooth transitions, and a pool of (presumably) non-boarding school kids whose poor choices are attracting attention (and discussion). </p>
<p>When it came to maturity, I never felt that the boarding school kids had, as a whole, a noticeable edge. Plenty of them were mature, responsible people, but (believe it or not) so were lots of other college freshmen. I do imagine that kids who boarded through HS had the edge in other areas, not necessarily related to overall maturity...homesickness, emotional adjustment to campus life and communal living, knowing what to pack, solving day-to-day problems without the aid of a parent, basic "life skills" like laundry and checkbook balancing, and so forth.</p>
<p>Like I said, I definitely knew some incredibly responsible, mature college students who came from boarding schools. I'm very sure that some of them attribute their maturity and responsibility to their high school experiences. But it's definitely not a generalization that's without many exceptions on both sides.</p>
<p>ETA: Cross-posted with a few others. And also, I didn't get any feeling of elitism from this thread. To be fair, most 18 year olds think they're more mature than their peers ;)</p>