<p>The "girls do better academically" argument only applies relative to the average non-gender specific student, and in fact the best males on an aggregate basis will typically outperform the best females.</p>
<p>Since the Ivy's attract the best male and best female students in the United States and in some cases the world - this is absolutely applicable in this case</p>
<p>This should hold true not just with grades, class rank etc but will various aptitude and intelligence tests, including the SATs and similar tests</p>
<p>Correspondingly on the low end, the least intelligent males in an aggregate sense tends to be less intelligent than the least intelligent women</p>
<p>This is a well documented phenomenon</p>
<p>Add to this the earlier described science factor - and it could explain why such a gap exists at Brown</p>
<p>Larry Summers at Harvard made some of these same points, which proved to be spectacularly unpopular</p>
<p>Another reason for Brown University and the Admissions Committee to keep any relevant statistics on these matters to themselves</p>