<p>Is that really necessary for us to keep recruiting the top undergraduate students?</p>
<p>Will the entire school no longer be an Ivy League level university without it?</p>
<p>Just curious for your opinions…</p>
<p>I honestly don’t think that that is the case.</p>
<p>Considering that undergraduate teaching is most of what Brown does, and that it’s better at it than almost any other school, and that the quality of the undergrad student body is hugely important for rankings, and lots of other things, I’m not sure why you think Brown is ‘clinging’ to it. What exactly is the cost?</p>
<p>Why do you say Brown is better at it than almost any other school?
What makes the teaching better at Brown than say at Swarthmore, or Yale,
or Dartmouth or Berkeley?
Is it that the university pays special attention to teaching compared to other schools?</p>
<p>The ‘better at it than most…’ part was just opinion - I was mostly just feeding the ■■■■■.</p>