<p>she kind of looks like megan fox…</p>
<p>Yes 10char</p>
<p>Jane Kramer, not bad. Also you must have some money :).</p>
<p>how about ucdavis? any cute white guys there? LOL</p>
<p>Cute white guys are probably more popular in so cal. Furthermore, UC Davis has a ton of Asians…but so does every other UC. If you want the hottest bunch of white men, I suggest applying to private schools such as Stanford or LMU.</p>
<p>LOL @ Stanford having hottest bunch of white men…some how i doubt you live in Palo Alto area if are making such a claim.</p>
<p>I live around Palo Alto (Los Gatos). I would know about Stanford because I go there frequently. The general rule of thumb is that upper-middle class to wealthy kids attend private colleges. The more wealthy a family is, the more likely they are able to send their kids to private colleges, especially those with high prestige. Rich people are generally more good looking because well…natural selection.</p>
<p>Too funny…LG is not ‘around’ PA. Prudently speaking, best to stick to business con-man instead of 19th century thought and pseudo-science that has already been debunked.</p>
<p>Oh, don’t tell me you’re one of those Creationism and “Intelligent Design” advocates. You call evolution pseudoscience?</p>
<p>BAHAHA HELL NO! The ideas he is talking about is neither evolution nor natural selection.</p>
<p>I apologize for misinterpreting your argument. Yes. @Investment’s logic behind his explanation is flawed. I have yet to see a study that demonstrated a correlation between families with wealth and sending their “good looking” kids to private schools. In addition, that is not the definition of natural selection.</p>
<p>Not to say there aren’t instances where that may be true but as a rule of thumb (stuck up ones anus and possibly sniffing?) I’m still cracking up over such outdated ideas even being proposed by some today.</p>
<p>UCLA: University of Caucasians Lost among Asians.</p>
<p>Says it allll</p>
<p>Right, but even certain instances is not enough to prove the original statement. I actually covered this in my psychology class. I had the preconceived notions that psychology was “common sense;” however, I was surprised to see the scientific method implemented in the field. This is a prime example of anecdotal evidence. Just because you can see “good looking” people at private schools near your area does mean it is actually true. The common “Well, it happened to my uncle, etc so it must be true” statement.</p>
<p>Empirical evidence > Anecdotal evidence. </p>
<p>Even if we were to hypothesis that wealthy families send their “good looking” kids to private universities than average people do, it would just be too complicated. First the study would be subjective rather than objectively. How can we objectively measure good looks? Even with the place of an operational definition, my opinions on “good looks” might greatly differ than yours. We would need a random sample, etc, etc. Very complicated study.</p>
<p>Still though, I do agree. That observation was outdated and flawed.</p>
<p>I say stuff like ‘the majority of the ugly girls go to Cal and UCSD’ and the cute ones go to Davis, SB, LA and SC just to be a smart arse. Even though that is my personal opinion general speaking (according to my subjective tastes and experiences hence anecdotal) I know it can’t be proved nor do I actually believe it as some rule of thumb haha or that would make me a dumb arse.</p>
<p>yeaaaaaaaaaaaa white ppl FTW AND MESSICANS…and asians…africans/native indians. and errrry1 out there too 
lol</p>
<p>The other day I saw the most AHHH9OH3589GHNDFKJG389U asian guy wearing a Berkeley sweatshirt. He seemed to be taking his little sis to see Tangled.
Win.</p>
<p>@redoplease</p>
<p>???</p>
<p>you know when a guy is so hot its like NIUOGH8TGNAKJLGNKLN???</p>
<p>I bet you were giggling like a little schoolgirl redoplease</p>
<p>then again, I would too lol</p>