<p>My brother is a pharmacist, he's forbidden his kid from even contemplating going down that road. He hates it. There is a lot of pressure, and there's no way he can work the kind of hours that was being contemplated earlier in this thread. You'd burn out.</p>
<p>Which is not to say that one might not burn out in I banking, either. </p>
<p>Intellectually I think pharmacy could possibly be quite interesting. Coming from a scientific background, I think theoretical pharmacy, the biochemistry aspect, etc, could quite possibly be as interesting as theoretical finance. But maybe from a pharmaceutical company aspect, rather than as a practitioner in the proverbial Walmart, with six people hovering over you waiting impatiently for their prescriptions.</p>
<p>Though senior bankers sitting with their clients at Lutece, waiting yet more impatiently, and calling in constantly to see whether the finalized details of their financing is ready yet, can be more stressful than that, probably.</p>
<p>I would suggest don't attempt either career solely for the money, life is short and you will likely not make it through. Or hate every day.</p>
<p>As long as there is good possibility to live decently, go where talents and interests lead you.</p>
<p>I must say though, it is impressive how easily my brother has been able to find work. Not always true on the other end. In the past, but undoubtedly moreso now. His career has truly been a lifelong career; for better or for worse. For a number of people I knew on the street this has not been the case.</p>
<p>But the skills & temperaments required to be happy and successful in each of these career paths may not have a lot of overlap, as hom5 has suggested. Like if you took a Strong Vocational Interest Test, the I banker and pharmacist occupations probably have like zero overlap. One would be very high on "Enterprising", the other very high on "Conventional". I imagine.</p>