<p>
[quote]
The athletic director said it was the first time he had heard of such an incident in his six years in the job.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>Baloney. The A.D. is blowing smoke on this.</p>
<p>in 2003, following a series of pre-frosh hospitalizations for alcohol poisoning over a period of years, the Dean of the College sent an e-mail to every student on campus, reaffirming the responsibilities of overnight hosts to NOT serve their guests alcohol or take them to events where alcohol is being served or host them on weekends for this specfic reason. At the time, the Admissions Office and Purple Key Society also instituted written notification of prosects and their parents that drinking during their visit was prohibited and that rules violations would impact their admissions.</p>
<p>In the 2003 article, Athletic Director Sheehey was clearly aware of the problem. He was quoted as follows in the Williams Record:</p>
<p>
[quote]
Moreover, Harry Sheehy, director of athletics, will meet with members of the Athletics Department, senior staff and members of the Student-Athlete Advisory committee to establish standards for student-athlete hosting, just as the Purple Key Society has done for their hosting. </p>
<p>We do not have anything written in stone as yet, Sheehy said. We have made no decision on having a parent or pre-frosh sign anything. We have heard that other schools require this. Our department is simply interested in the safety and well-being of all parties involved.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>Yet, two years later, when a recruit was hospitalized for alcohol poisoning on a Saturday night visit arranged by the athletic department (in violation of campus-wide policy), it was clear that Sheehey had NOT instituted a written policy:</p>
<p>
[quote]
There will be a new written baseline policy, augmented by individual team rules, Sheehy said. Parents and athletes need to realize what our standards are.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>Where was Sheehy's leadership on this issue for the last two years or the five years since he's been A.D.? Given the problems with pre-frosh hospitalizations at the school (they had one nearly die in April 2000) and given Sheehey's stonewalling on the issue in the intervening years, I think the administration should come down on him like a ton of bricks. There is no reason that athletic visits should be governed by a different set of standards and rules. It's the same double-speak from the A.D. that fraternity leaders spout about dry pledge events and so forth.</p>