<p>Buddin or McDevitt for Econ 101? I heard Buddin is easier than McDevitt. Is that true?</p>
<p>mcdevitt is the king. all hail the king of econ. take him</p>
<p>Any other kings of econ?</p>
<p>Hellwig is probably the prince, and the rest are peasants lol. At least that's what I've heard.</p>
<p>I will be a 3rd year and McDevitt is probably the worst professor I've had yet. I'm not sure if these guys are messin with you, but I'd avoid McD's at all costs</p>
<p>bruinwalk.com baby</p>
<p>vtown: If you thought McDevitt was the worst, you probably shouldn't major in econ. :p cause all the other profs are way worse.</p>
<p>yahooo just owned the LIVING HELL OUT of that FOOL</p>
<p>again, all hail king mcdevitt III</p>
<p>depends. if you liked mcdevitt for 11, then you should take him for 101. i had buddin for 101, and though he was a horrible lecturer, his tests were pretty straightforward and had none of those annoying multiple choice questions.</p>
<p>ok, if mcdevitt is considered the king of econ here, that would just reflect the sorry state of this department. sure, he's good relative to a lot of other econ professors at ucla, but in the absolute sense, i wouldnt call him a standout professor. </p>
<p>who is the king of econ? kahn, hands down.</p>
<p>are you serious? does kahn even teach any upper divs? his econ 41 is like second grade math. come now, my friend</p>
<p>the econ 41 prof you're talking about is HAHN, fool. kahn is a tenured prof here and teaches select upper divs only. his classes blow the typical ucla econ class out of the water. you haven't had a real econ class here unless you've taken it with kahn.</p>
<p>Hey cheesecake, didn't you say you were going to make a thread about the crapiness of the econ department?</p>
<p>yep, will do. too many people jump into the major uninformed</p>
<p>^ You're procrastinating cheese :P you said that you would post it after finals...</p>
<p>that's what I have thought too ^_^</p>