<p>Ok, guys, how do you think you did? For me, macro sucked. I know I messed up on the graph for the 1st FR question. (argh! easy one, I know!) So I'm thinking a 2. Micro was a bit easier.... Definitely not going to jynx myself by predicting a score, though...</p>
<p>But hopefully the curve won't be too bad. A lot pf the people I took it with gave up after 20 minutes and started napped instead. So maybe, with a little luck, my efforts will be rewarded. :)</p>
<p>I only took Micro. I used an online course but I thought I was pretty well prepared. I'm predicting a high 4 or a low 5...MC was okay, FR was fairly easy. I was the only one in my district who took the exam..</p>
<p>well i guess its all on experience.....i had a class in macro and self-studied micro........i absolutely despised micro....maybe because i wasnt taught it formally lol.....imho its micro.</p>
<p>I think Micro is a zillion times easier. If you are more english/language oriented, Macro is right for you. If you are more math oriented, Micro is right for you.</p>
<p>I thought that the macro MC were pretty easy. I'm expecting to miss no more than 5, but hopefully only about 3. The FRQs weren't too bad. One was a breeze, two wasn't terrible, although I don't think I will get full credit, and three was fine until part (c)--I definitely botched the long-run Phillips curve. But oh well. I'm hoping for a 5, but would be content with a 4.</p>
<p>Micro was ridiculously easy, although the free response questions took me a REALLY long time, because I explained EVERYTHING in detail. The macro one wasn't bad either.</p>
<p>I think macro's a bit harder since it requires you to imagine supply/demand in bigger, often more abstract, ways than mirco. Micro is operated on a smaller scale, so it's a bit easier to understand relationships between things. that's just my opinion tho.</p>
<p>either way, i'm never again doing economics self-study...</p>