<p>After seeing the triumph and chaos on CC following the EA and ED decisions I believe I can give a proper statement on what colleges WANT to see in terms of extracurriculars. Many of you may already know this, but I believe many others do not. However, while reading this please remember that this is just one person's opinion and I may be in fact wrong. I am not claiming to know the exact answer, but this should help. </p>
<p>I recently applied to Stanford University under the SCEA program and was accepted, and I was thinking, why did they accept me? I have great grades and rank, average test scores (30 ACT for Stanford), but I don't have these huge lists of EC's like all these other students. To be exact I only listed four EC's, which aren't even amazing under any standards of normal viewing. Here is what I listed:</p>
<p>Playing Guitar- (7 hr/wk, 52wks/yr, Self-Taught)
Chess Club- (1.5 hr/wk, 38wks/yr, Founder and current Vice-President)
Junior Statesmen of America- (1 hr/wk, 32 wks/yr, current Assembly Member)
Creative Minds (art club)- (1 hr/wk, 28 wks/yr, current Treasurer)</p>
<p>Now, you are probably laughing or something to that extent. Well the thing is, I agree with you this list is boring, but I had to breathe it life. In my application I talked about my passion for music and creativity. I showed that I loved chess and politics on a wide scale. By doing this I gave this very seemingly uneventful list life and truth. I expanded these EC's into who I was as an individual. I didn't have lists and I didn't have any fluff in my application. I presented myself. Though EC's are just one part of the application, I believe they show much more about a person than just test scores and grades.</p>
<p>My friends had always told me, "Hey man, you better get a sport or else you won't look well rounded when colleges see you." I ignored them because I don't like sports and I would not join one, because I would just be putting on a facade for the ADcoms wherever I applied. I didn't want to join things that did not interest me. Therefore, I just did what I wanted to do and what I felt was fun or interesting for me. The fact is, that I am involved in a few more EC's than the 4 listed here, but I did not feel that by listing them I would present myself any better. Me being in math club was not some huge thing for me. It was fun, but I didn't care to put it on my application.</p>
<p>So, my advice to you is "Stop making lists and start finding passions." Don't join something because it will help you on your college apps, do it because you want to do it. A previous statement I had said before on CC was "Stand out and be yourself." Let the ADcoms figure out the rest. If you just be yourself, then a rejection is not that bad, because you just were not their type. It doesn't show a personal flaw, but conflicting interests. A Bible-belt conservative would not be good at UC Berkeley, just like many students would not be best for certain college atmospheres. I honestly would fail at Cal Tech, that's why I didn't bother applying. If you learned anything from this whole rant, let it be this "Find what you love to do, and do it." Life figures out the rest. </p>
<p>I hope this has been helpful to some of the up-and-comers or anyone else who needed advice.</p>