@joecollege44 : She can honestly blend her interests then. Maybe human health or NBB is a safe bet (well-resourced, good EC/co-curricular events and opps, a study abroad program) for a primary major and anthropology can be dabbled in (or she could choose one of the associated minors). Because departments like biology, chemistry, anthropology, and NBB allow for heavy “dabbling” because they don’t put restrictions on who can take their upper division courses/electives (like as soon as you complete general biology, basically all the upper division biology courses open up. The NBB core courses minus 401 can almost be taken in any order, and then after 301, she can take the NBB hosted electives). Human health is maybe the only one that restricts entry into several upper divsions to those majoring in it. And interestingly enough, many of those upper divsions are apparently surprisingly on the “sciencey” side and benefit from students having backgrounds in things like general biology, human genetics, microbiology, etc which can be taken over in biology. There are actually genuine science labs connected to the Human Health Program (which is basically interdisciplinary) such as Dr. Quave’s natural products lab which is very well known and very open to undergraduate students who want to do research.
NBB is also interdisciplinary and gives tons of freedom and access to courses in other departments beyond the core sequence, but it has a fairly stringent, science oriented core (201,301, 302, 401).
Anthropology and Human biology at Emory is very strong, but educationally, I think NBB and Human Health may fit your daughter better. She can just take additional STEM courses (like physics, ochem, stats. and calc courses of interest) for pre-health or graduate school if she does human health. If she is more science oriented, it helps to be in a major where more of the core and elective offerings are a mixture of both scientific knowledge and methods. I think the courses and what many of them entail will just be more rigorous and develop her scientific thinking skills and knowledge better than anthropology. Anthropology has a few solid courses that do this, but sadly it is generally known as sort of a “cop-out” major for pre-healths.
One would think Human health would be a softer major than anthropology, but its relationship with the public health school, cdc, etc give it more scientifically focused course offerings that what one may expect. Anthropology definitely leans closer in the direction of pure social sciences overall vs. NBB and human health. And Human health also may draw more serious students because its programs require a capstone project of some sort. Needless to say, this sort of filters out less serious students who may otherwise just go there to take a set of easy courses to function as a GPA booster for med. schools. They want students to understand the research and current developments in various fields of healthcare, nutrition, etc and then be able to apply it
I honestly recommend having your daughter look through some of the course offerings in the 3 majors for this semester (spring 2020) and fall 2020, and maybe even Fall 2019 in Emory’s course atlas: Often courses in anthropology and human health have very detailed course discriptions (also note that key courses listed by NBB may originate from other departments in which case the listing will make you aware and sometimes the host department will provide the more detailed description):https://atlas.emory.edu/
Maybe this can help her see what is out there in terms of the course work she has access to in each. And out of the 3, I would admit that NBB likely has the best out of class infrastructure This is no suprise because it is one of the first if not the first UG neuro programs in the U.S., very popular (probably among the largest in the country), rigorous, and super well-funded (and it has the benefit of not being directly associated with the graduate or medical school in terms of being a program, so there aren’t like competing teaching vs. research interest. It is its own thing fully focused on undergrads) so has many study abroad opps, fellowships (has an excellent relationship with St. Andrews in Scotland which leads to many cool programs that are revered by students and faculty), its own undergraduate research symposia, etc. I’ve actually compared it to many neuro programs at near ranked (some higher, some same, some a little lower) peers and it appears to be another animal (in a good way) vs. most of them in terms of how well developed it is and how focused it is on undergrads (just looking at a departmental website can tell you a ton!).