<p>I noticed you did posts in NU thread also. Let me warn you about the rigor issue. This gets tricky. I have seen coursework at various peers, and you hardly notice a difference in the level of work or material in classes typically taken by pre-meds. For example, it is unfair to say that NU’s chem. program being ranked higher translates into more rigor. That may certainly be the case beyond organic chemistry (most pre-meds do not go beyond this), but both of us are notoriously hard for organic chem., the difference would be the pace if anything else due to the quarter system. The students tried to convince you that all of the classes at NU are hard, while ours are easy. My roommate last year told me he doesn’t feel the difference (he transferred from there), and feels that we actually take non-sciences more serious. His workload increased infinitely this year, and he’s a political science major that now spends about as much time in the library as I do now. Needless to say, he would make no such claims about the rigor. Gen. Bio at nearly all peer institutions is hardly different in the material covered. And despite this “rigor” at NU, the grading is still about the same as us and the other peers. I’m willing to bet that they even grade. gen. chem and bio on a curve (most private schools, would curve up if average is not a B- in these, but profs. here care less in intro). Hardly no profs. do that here. If the courses average is C+, it’s C+. NU always has at least a B-. Surprisingly, I also found that some of the gen. chem. sections (friend sent an exam) here are actually tougher than theirs in terms of exam content/style. However, the lab component of theirs is much tougher from what my roommate told me (he watched his friends go through it). Point is, avoid these assumptions made by some posters unless they attended both. Neither of these schools are going to feel but so easy or rigorous when you get there. Again, unless you are a chem. major or wanting to get really serious with theater, don’t easily sway based upon these. Worry about what type of atmosphere you want. Do you want Chicago, do you want the sense of pride garnered by D1 sports? These were all valid points stressed over there. </p>
<p>Also, grad/prof. school rankings will not help w/ur undergrad. experience, so remove hype associated with such differences. All that should matter is that you can be connected with these somehow. For example, many undergrads. here do research via the med. school, and many do serious volunteer work at Grady (one of my friends was a counselor there when he was a freshman, which was last year). I’d imagine NU students may have easy access to such opps. too. This is even unfair given Emory’s youth (which is exactly why we lack respect from students who attend NU) as a big player.<br>
The schools are very different in feel and focus perhaps, but one with common sense should recognize that the two are academically on par at the undergrad level. Some of those folks thought it was ridiculous to even compare that. I think ppl let ranks fool them.<br>
As the young one, we have the most difficulty garnering respect, and the rank suffers accordingly. Also, Emory is new to marketing, so that affects applicant numbers and stuff. In reality, the school has not actually gotten worse I think. </p>
<p>However, don’t take my word from it. I’ve had an amazing experience partially due to the connections and friends I’ve made. I also refuse to intentionally enroll in easier courses and claim “the school is easy”. However, many students don’t like it here b/c they really don’t have connections or they came in with the preconceived notion that the higher ranked schools are actually far different from Emory. There are even some convinced, b/c of rankings, that Vandy’s courses, faculty and academic environment are actually significantly stronger for example b/c they now rank 3 spots above, even though we were tied for the past 3 years. Amazing that students believe those rankings actually depict the intrinsic academic quality of a school (pretty tough to do on a yearly basis anyway). That makes a lot of sense. “Emory’s courses and profs. just turned crappy in 2010. Dr. Weinschenk must of taught poorly last year. I hope it’s alright in 2011” lol. All of this and we’re still a top 20. Guess not even that is good enough for some folks here.</p>
<p>It would really be best for some freshmen to give their experiences so far. Surely some will dislike/hate it (again, like all the school has its flaws which will affect some more than others) and some will have enjoyed it so far.</p>