<p>Dualitytim -- I have a feeling the curve may get even a little bit more generous this year.</p>
<p>i need a 4 or 5 to get credit for college but i'd like a 5 (as i'm sure so does everyone else)! it's my fav number and all the other good stuff that goes with it!</p>
<p>dualityim- whoa that scoring range is really low.
is that an official curve from last year or something that you just guess on? ONe can only hope the cutoff is that low.</p>
<p>That is a curve from 2 or 3 years back.</p>
<p>the mock test (which was an old ap test) I took for class (dunno what year it was) but you needed a 75 to get a 5, this is BC. I hope it's be lower than that.</p>
<p>But if you think about it, wouldn't the relatively easy mc cancel out the ridiculously hard fr? Therefore giving you a regular curve like all the other years?</p>
<p>I'm sure that's what they assumed when they made the test but who the hell knows how it's going to work out for real until they actually score all of them. If the distribution is similar to the past exams, there's no reason to change the curve.</p>
<p>does anyone know how they get the ab subscore and if they scoring range is the same for both the ab test and the ab subscore?</p>
<p>.001% people score higher on BC than AB subscore - a true fact from my calc teacher</p>
<p>I thought the ab part would be easier.</p>
<p>Yeah, thats why its .001% people who do better on BC than AB, everyone else does the same or better on AB</p>
<p>.001%? thats less than 1 person a year lol</p>
<p>i thought ab mc was bad. </p>
<p>i feel stupid.</p>
<p>first section of AB was incredibly difficult, the last 3 sections were a cake walk.. anybody else notice the huge discrepency in difficulty?</p>