<p>I approved majority rule:</p>
<p>My thesis:</p>
<p>Majority rule is appropriate in the area of government in the U.S. The governement in the U.S is a democratic-republic where the majority elects officials to make the decisions on how to run the country.</p>
<p>Wrote about checks and balances a bit for the 2nd paragraph</p>
<p>3rd - Congress => Made up of the Senate and the House, from both, officials are elected and those officials draft new laws and the majority rule votes new laws to be passed. These laws are then sent to the President. The president has the option to veto any laws passed by the majority in Congress, keeping congress in check.</p>
<p>4th Paragraph - The president may veto any law passed by Congress (majority vote). Also, the general public's vote suggests how popular the president is, but this is not how the presidency is selected. The public votes electoral college officials in (majority rule) whom then elect the new president. The judiciary branch keeps the president in check as the Supreme Justices (elected by majority rule) may rule any laws ratified by the President and Congress, unconstitutional. </p>
<p>Therefore, majority rule is great based upon the system of checks and balances (or something like that)</p>
<p>Yep, that's basically my essay. A little better maybe, a little worse perhaps. I actually marked by my paragraphs that the 4th paragraph was actually the third, and vice versa. You are indeed allowed to include essay changes through symbolic editing letters (legitamately, so they can't take off for them).</p>
<p>Comments? I had to cut it short, just like everyone else so my conclusion was kinda weak.</p>