<p>What it boils down to is will the school that gives the better scholarship do what the student needs (yeah, I know, easy question to answer <em>lol</em>). It depends on a lot of factors, about what the student plans to do, what they are in (it might be a different answer for vocal performance then instrumental), and the kind of music (could be different for Jazz or contemporary music then classical). Here is my summary of what I have read on here and seen with music students in past years, just my thoughts:</p>
<p>-The key is going to be the teacher, a program that gives a full ride scholarship but the teachers in the department don’t seem to be a fit/aren’t good/don’t show success with students may be a waste of time. On the other hand, if the program has teachers who seem to be a fit, seem to have turned out successful students in the past, then it might be really, really wise to go for the better money and not go for the ‘name’ program. </p>
<p>-Name programs do tend to have advantages that need to be factored into the decision, but a no name program could have similar ones, depends on the faculty and such. A no name program in a relatively culturally dense area (NY, Chicago, etc) might have performance opportunities and networking opportunities that a ‘name’ school in a less dense region might have…needs to be looked at as a weighting factor.</p>
<p>-It also depends on the student. If the student is strongly self motivated, if they drive from within rather then from without, the ‘less name’ program might work as well as the name program for them. On the other hand, one of the advantages of the name program for some students is seeing the average high level of students usually at such places (whereas a no name school prob has a wider range of abilities and the average is much lower then the name school, if simply because name school gets a lot of top level applicants and are much more choosy), they can be driven ‘upward’ in their drive to becoming a top player by seeing kids better then them. One of the reasons ‘no name’ or ‘rising’ programs offer those kinds of deals is they are seeking a way to attract top level music students to their program, to bring it up, to compete with the name schools mystique and so forth. </p>
<p>My take on it is similar to others, that if the teaching and such seems top notch, fit the students needs, I would lean towards the lesser known school with the better financial package. Even going to a Berklee, or to an NEC, Juilliard, etc is tough, tough sledding for graduates in terms of making it, and coming out with 6 figures of debt, for example, or breaking the family finances to pay for it, doesn’t make sense to me if the future is tenuous there and i think if the lesser name program has decent teachers and the like, you could have overall the same chances of ‘making it’ without being burdened by the debt, gives you more flexibility in the future.</p>