<p>I have bad short-term memory....</p>
<p>Did anybody have 2 consecutive CR sections in a row around the beginning of testing session? Cause I did....</p>
<p>If so, anybody have a clue which one of the two was experimental? Cause of all the practice test that I've taken, I have never seen two same sections in a row...</p>
<p>There were three types of tests i believe, each with a different experimental section. Your experimental section was the one about Nixon I believe. </p>
<p>We had two math sections with grid-ins, surefire sign that one was an experimental.</p>
<p>Hmmm....was nixon one of the two consecutive ones or one aappearing later in the test?</p>
<p>With my bad memories, I cant recall what passaged are in what setions... All I know is I got 2 consecutive CR's, which seemed really fishy... I really hope the first of the two consecutive was experimental. I left 6 blank in the end cause I couldnt finish (actually, I think the teacher called 5 minutes earlier than the supposed time). Every other CR's I completed in time...... </p>
<p>In general, I think the CR section was r3t4rded. It was freaking hard, especially the fill-in-the-blanks....</p>
<p>But which one of the two Grid-Ins is the experimental? Hopefully the second grid in!</p>
<p>i hope so too but lots of people are saying it's the first section</p>
<p>"i hope so too but lots of people are saying it's the first section"</p>
<p>im sure all these people are clairvoyant and you should believe their assumption</p>
<p>But people who didn't have math experimental said they didnt have questions from the second math grid-in.</p>
<p>ARgh...this is ****ing me off. Im almost certain for an 800 math today... Completed each section with 5 minutes left.. Stupid CR! I think I got below a 700 :( Im almost certain that the teacher called time 5 minutes early. I always time myself 5 minutes per 5-7 questions and 5 minutes for reading!!!! Damn, I should have argued....</p>
<p>Anyways, anybody have 2 consecutive CR sections around the beginning of the test like me?</p>
<p>True that, true that aszx my bad</p>
<p>I dunno... based on the types of questions asked it seems that the 2nd grid-in was experimental. But, I could always be wrong (which I hope I'm not.)</p>
<p>uhhh...is there anyway for all those ppl w/o math experimental to be wrong? please? </p>
<p>that first grid-in was so much harder than the second. i thought i did fairly well w/ time left over for second. for the first, i didn't check and had to leave two blank. fabulous.</p>
<p>some people only had one grid-in, so there was definitely no way to have a math experimental.</p>
<p>i had 2 grid in sections...2nd was unusually hard for an SAT, so thats prolly the experimental</p>
<p>Same here, I think the 2nd grid-in was the math experimental--some of the question-types were pretty different.</p>
<p>I had 2 straight CRs, but i dont remember Nixon. What else was in the nixon section?</p>
<p>Ya, I had Nixon but Im pretty sure that was the 20 minute CR section. It's not possible for 20 minutes to be experimental..... Im hoping and guessing that the first of the two consecutive CR sections was the experimental considering that nobody said anything that popped into my mind... It was also unusually hard. 6 questions left blank while only 1 skip from the other 3 CR section? Something's fishy.....</p>
<p>@Rachmaninoff : I had two consecutive CRs in the beginning but I hope the second one is experimental coz' I left one blank in that.</p>
<p>I had four critical reading sections and the one with Nixon was section three for me. I didn't think it was too bad, I actually liked that section. I didn't get a Math experimental</p>
<p>Was the one with the second grid-in the one with the "turn this grid shape around 90 degree counterclockwise" question? :( Cause I think I liked that section.</p>
<p>^^I don't think so. That section was one of my regular math sections.</p>