Extracurriculars?

<p>

ECs play a minor role, if even that. Its just grades and scores for most colleges, and at many the bar just isn’t very high on even those. Actually most colleges in the US accept most of their applicants. On the other hand if your definition of “good college” is the top 100 or so most in demand out of the 3,000+ 4-year colleges in the US, yes they care about ECs.

For the colleges that DO care about ECs, mere participation is meaningless. That doesn’t even put you in the running for a selective college. They want to see leadership and achievement. So if your primary reason for playing this sport is the thought that just being on the team for 4 years is going to impress an adcom someday, you should understand that it won’t.</p>

<p>The question about impressive ECs comes up regularly on the forum. There is a thread with several posts by Northstarmom, a Ivy alum interviewer, about what constitutes impressive ECs from the point of view of the most selective colleges. The post is at <a href=“http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/what-my-chances/210497-those-ecs-weak-so-what-s-good.html[/url]”>http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/what-my-chances/210497-those-ecs-weak-so-what-s-good.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

<p>As you will see from that link, at the most selective colleges they are looking for depth more than just participation. Stanford, for example, says

</p>