Fall 2007 Application Stats now Online

<p>Found at <a href=“http://www.ucop.edu/news/studstaff.html[/url]”>http://www.ucop.edu/news/studstaff.html</a></p>

<p>Thanks for posting this link-</p>

<p>Davis #1 in increased number of applications @ 7.6%!</p>

<p>This is the current brand new 2007 information
total # applications up
UCD + 7.6%
UCI + 4.0 %
overall SAT scores of applicants
UCD 1746
UCI 1719
This is hardly an anomaly.
Overall applicant pool:
1. CAL
2. UCSD
3. UCLA
4. UCD
5. UCSB
6. UCI
7. UCSC</p>

<p>yyyeeessssss.</p>

<p>i <3 uci.</p>

<p>
[quote]
Overall applicant pool:
1. CAL
2. UCSD
3. UCLA
4. UCD
5. UCSB
6. UCI
7. UCSC

[/quote]
</p>

<p>What does that mean?</p>

<p>Go look at the numbers. Look at the quality of the applicants based on their statistics. </p>

<p>A-G courses
CAL 47.2
UCSD 46.8
UCLA 46.7
UCD 46.5
UCSC 46.2
UCSB 46.1
UCI 46.1</p>

<p>GPA
CAL 3.83
UCLA 3.77
UCSD 3.75
UCD 3.68
UCSB 3.65
UCI 3.65
UCSC 3.55</p>

<p>ACT scores
CAL 26
UCSD 25
UCLA 25
UCD 25
UCSB 25
UCI 24
UCSC 24</p>

<p>SAT verbal + math
CAL 1225
UCSD 1202
UCLA 1196
UCD 1172
UCSB 1163
UCI 1155
UCSC 1146</p>

<p>SAT writing
CAL 601
UCSD 589
UCLA 587
UCSB 574
UCD 573
UCSC 565
UCI 564</p>

<p>SAT overall
CAL 1826
UCSD 1791
UCLA 1783
UCD 1746
UCSB 1737
UCI 1719
UCSC 1711</p>

<p>***?? i dont understand the gpa and sat stats on this, theyre obviously not right since LA last yr was like 2010 and 4.1</p>

<p>The posted data represent the average values of those who APPLY to the stated schools. These values are NOT the averages for those offered admission to the stated schools.</p>

<p>Overall applicant pool</p>

<p>Go up and re-read the post it says pool. The point is clear. This is the average of who applied to the various UC's this year.</p>

<p>I wouldn't read too much into the average applicant stats. Its the average admitted stats that is a more "telling" story. </p>

<p>For example, I looked at 2006, 2005 and 2004 applicants and admitted students. UCD generally had higher stats than UCI for applicants. However, for admitted students, UCI had higher stats than UCD. </p>

<p>But overall, it still is the same, UCB and UCLA are competitively similar, and so is UCD/UCI/UCSB. This really hasnt changed too much over the years.</p>

<p>I looked at the 2006 admissions stats, too. I preferred looking at the applicant pool data for this year, though. :D</p>

<p>LOL. </p>

<p>It will be an interesting year for UCD, UCI and UCSD. All of them accepted too many applicants last year, so I imagine they will be tightening things up this year, particularly UCD since they recieve a large increase in apps.</p>

<p>okay so now I do not feel so bad. At least she is above the median that applied at all the schools. I guess she does have a chance</p>

<p>"The posted data represent the average values of those who APPLY to the stated schools. These values are NOT the averages for those offered admission to the stated schools."</p>

<p>It doesn't even matter about who is offered admission, in the end it is about who accepts the offer.</p>