<p>@Jesuis thank god!
@paris, its what they say, but from what i read, it seemed that most got theirs already :/</p>
<p>@sikke, what do you mean by random method?</p>
<p>@UC i meant “rolling bases” xP</p>
<p>I didn’t get Irvine either!!! Makes me so depressed…if I was accepted already I wouldnt be worrying half as much for SD as I am right now</p>
<p>does anyone wana read my essay? i wana see if i waulify for the 500 points of hardship</p>
<p>Does anyone know how the AdCom determines whether or not you get points for low income? If you got a fee waiver would that constitute low income?</p>
<p>Yeah, I’m pretty sure you qualify, Mantis</p>
<p>:D</p>
<p>And what’s the estimated cutoff for this year? 7800? 7900? Oh god, 8000?!?!</p>
<p>mmmmmm I think they guestimated around 7800. but it’s partially holistic this year sooo…</p>
<p>My point total is exactly 7800 (although there are some other areas I might get points from.)</p>
<p>I fall short…by a significant amount</p>
<p>I estimated myself to be just a skosh over 8k…but I have a feeling I was a little too liberal in giving myself points lol</p>
<p>how does one calculate points? I know it was mentioned before but theres literally 100 something pages…</p>
<p>[ucsd</a> score](<a href=“http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pKB1yD5iQn_8wqH5bhMkhZw]ucsd”>http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pKB1yD5iQn_8wqH5bhMkhZw)</p>
<p>Thank YOU - nothing like a little anxiety before I sleep</p>
<p>will they continue calling tomorrow? I didn’t get a call from UCSD. I wonder if they called by last name alphabetic order or by major or by SAT1 score or by … :[ no call means rejected?</p>
<p>Calls are going on from the 16th-19th, usually during the late afternoon-evening.
And PLEASE READ THROUGH THIS FORUM BEFORE ASKING QUESTIONS ABOUT CALLS AGAIN.</p>
<p>No call does NOT mean rejected. They’re calling Regent Scholars’ and URMs. You can still be accepted.</p>
<p>Yes, getkellogg. No call means automatic rejection.</p>
<p>eeeeww I just calculated my score</p>
<p>jesus! let’s read through this thread.</p>