<p>was the treacherous trek and 3000 miles in the same answer? I forgot. I just know I put the one with the amount of miles as an answer.</p>
<p>scale* 10char</p>
<p>I’m sorry, but I don’t believe you can simply turn the shape. If you knew the lengths of the inscribed lines, maybe. But I’m still confident.</p>
<p>MY estimation for english :
1 wrong = 39
2 wrong = 38
just kidding…</p>
<p>it will be the same as they usually are…english 1-2 wrong per point.
math a point per question for like the first 5 and then it will get easier as you get lower…
reading is 1 per until a 30 and then it evens out…
science will be really tough as usual</p>
<p>@Starky727
I remember how to do it now! I did put 4 on that. I thought I put 4.5 for some reason but here is the explanation for the problem.
<a href=“http://i56.■■■■■■■.com/wlbwxe.jpg[/IMG]”>http://i56.■■■■■■■.com/wlbwxe.jpg
![http://i56.■■■■■■■.com/wlbwxe.jpg[/IMG]](http://i56.tinypic.com/wlbwxe.jpg%5B/IMG%5D){kind=link}
</a></p>
<p>Yeah I’m not sure if I used whom but if I did it was only once.& It was the author’s perspective of the naturalist because it said something like “a naturalist MIGHT argue that…”</p>
<p>probably normal curves. Nothing seemed too difficult/easy.</p>
<p>I really think that trying to find the area by splitting it up was way too complicated. Here’s how I drew it. </p>
<p>[0212111531.jpg</a> picture by wi11k3 - Photobucket](<a href=“Photo and Video Storage | Photobucket”>Photo and Video Storage | Photobucket)</p>
<p>I really don’t see how it could be anything other than 4 if the squares corner was touching the other squares center.</p>
<p>@cooldude987… good job buddy way to end the discussion :)</p>
<p>Yay, we’ve finally got an answer/explanation that makes sense!</p>
<p>@Vanaalst - Exactly what I did. We made the problem way too complicated lol.</p>
<p>YES! Toldyaaa.</p>
<p>90* cannot be argued with.
try mounting an X on a square, dividing it into 4 equal parts, with the center of the X on the center of the square.
It is impossible to make 4 unequal parts out of a rotating 90* division.</p>
<p>Game over.</p>
<p>That makes much more sense than what I thought haha. Luckily I still got it right.</p>
<p>I disagree. No question would be that easy in the last 4. To each his own. Good thing I’ve got 3 36’s in math. :D</p>
<p>@touhou - I did this for the CR and writing superscore 
I have a couple 34 composites because I suck at both reading and writing. Communication arts is obviously not my forte when it comes to standardized testing.</p>
<p>oh sorry yeah… then i think we ahve the same answer for english. we just remembered different parts of the answer</p>
<p>Math: Easy cause I’m a competitive mathlete
English: Easy, except about that paragraph on the movie in Nebraska, did the author accomplish the purpose of showing how a movie affected a midwestern city? I put yes, because people’s daily routines were affected, but this doesn’t seem like a great anwer. what did u all put on this one?</p>
<p>Science: pretty easy I think
Reading: I had to read the fiction with four minutes left…it was hard.</p>
<p>^^^ yep. It was “treacherous trek across 3000 miles of the north african coast”</p>
<p>i put the same as you for english</p>
<p>I got that too APChemistry.</p>