<p>I needed some antidote or whatnot
took out two more twilight (1 and 2. I’ve seen 3) from the library, now un wanted /untoutched for weeks.
watched it one per day and now feel somewhat better
It was fun. I mean, so much better than the books. actors are actually better than book characters, they got dimentions, 3D.
little bits like, key chains on Bella (heroine)‘s backpack or a juice bottle in cafetelia tells subtle stories that book version failed to show.
people who made these movies really spend lots of (money) and effort.
Edward (the vampire) boy is creepy-er than ever. white faced but there are few birthmarks on his left back neck that seems so human-y and his arms are hairy. just seen Harry Potter 4 and how young, naive, dorky he looked in it makes me wonder what he might be thinking sorounded by million screaming girls at film events (footage was in the bonus disc)
digi-wolves are cute, well made. vampires fighting scenes are Matrix or I don’t know those things, but 300?sh, mortal combat (what? how old ARE you?) -those things with whoosh!! sounds. pretty modern. contemp conceptu digital fighting.
music too, esp, new moon (2) I don’t deal with girls much. don’t know how teens out of cities live. I can see it (sort of) so this is how they might feel things!
assuming every movie going girls have read books already, visual aide with few nice tweaking and massive edditing helps to concentrate like frozen juice in the cardboard tubes and reafirm those girlly feelings. (and everything is now got dimention!!!) how nice.
so
this is girls’ Lord of the Rings, or step up from HPs tweendom.
In the bonus disc, the director said
“this(film)will outlive you” or something like that. I might agree. It sure made fang mark on the generation. could be in Criterion Collection circa 2050!?!?!?!?!</p>