<p>silversenior,
First of all <<hugs>> to you and your family. This time immediately after the acceptances/rejections/waitlists come in is extremely difficult for parents. Two years ago, my H and I were in your position with acceptances for S to Chicago and Berkeley (in state). We are both public servants who chose our work because of what we could give back, but I remember all too well the feeling of inadequacy and fear as I stared at the numbers from Chicago, which I felt to be the best choice for S, but which would have cost us 100K more than Cal. Your post has brought it all back, as if two years haven't passed at all. I just have a few comments:</hugs></p>
<p>
[quote]
Remember upward mobility? Remember the whole idea of working your butt off so that your children could have what you couldn't?
My father grew up in abject poverty and manged to go from slums and public housing to raise a daughter who went to MIT and Columbia Law school and who owns her own home...
[/quote]
</p>
<p>
[quote]
I think I just feel like an abject failure that I can't comfortably afford to pay for college for my son!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
<p>I can't give him what my parents gave me... (of course, their EFC was not much more than 0!)
[/quote]
</p>
<p>You already said it, but it bears repeating. Your hard-working but poor father did not "give" you the private school college education. He couldn't have. You earned the acceptance (as your son has earned Oberlin's) and the government did the rest (requiring MIT to lower your tuition to practically nothing). Your parents would not have been able to send you to MIT at its full cost, right? There is no shame in that. So don't be ashamed that you can't do the same. </p>
<p>
[quote]
Trust me, the day I decided to become a poverty lawyer I was not thinking about paying for college for a theoretical child way in the future... I was trying to change the world so that no child would be unable to afford college or medical care or food or shelter...
[/quote]
</p>
<p>And this is where you stepped off the upward-mobility economic machine. People who go into public service and accept salaries that are substantially less than those in the private sector do something that is, ecomonically speaking, fundamentally illogical. If you were playing Monopoly, it would be like selling Park Place at a 10th of its value. The only reason you would do that would be if you weren't playing the game to win, if you were playing it for some other reason than to accumulate more property and money than anyone else. And you and your husband have not been playing this particular game 'right.' You made that choice long ago and have had to live with smaller, subtler feelings of "betrayal" all along. Probably the cars you drive, the addresses you've called home, the schools your S's attended, the clothing stores you shop at... but nothing hits home like being able (or unable) to send your kid to any college his heart desires. It's one thing to deny yourself a high-end lifestyle because you believe in helping the less fortunate, it's another thing to deny your kids their dreams, their future, their opportunities. And you could have avoided this by taking the corporate law jobs; you had a choice.</p>
<p>But...</p>
<p>...while you may have opted off the economic upwardly-mobile machine, and your children may have to be content to go to public universities and just match your lifestyle and income rather than exceed it (which is better than 98% of the world anyhow), you stepped onto an ethical upwardly-mobile footpath. This is the path that is practically invisible in our rather sad and mean times, where greed, envy and one-upsmanship often masquerade as a work ethic, and where massive debt-denial manifests as outward success like some kind of magical elixir that most people don't understand and all too happily imbibe. This path exists a little below the radar of the advertising and media worlds, though many journalists made the same decision as you and your H long ago: the public good before private gain. Ordinary and quiet, it's too well-meaning and nice to get any headlines or attention. It generally can't be found in the luxury car dealerships, the finer zip codes, the box seats of stadiums and the tony private secondary schools, and not just because these folks can't afford it, but because they are often, and generally, not interested in such stuff (well, box seats, maybe). </p>
<p>The people who choose this route (not just public servants, but anyone who gives up private economic gain to take on the work of those who are less able) get their kicks from "making a difference." Their reward comes from knowing "what could have happened" to those "defendants, plaintiffs, students, patients, foster kids, run-aways, drop-outs, mentally ill, veterans..." Helping someone who is truly, truly in need is what moves their hearts, their hands, their souls. It is what brings honor to their work. </p>
<p>Your story is a beautiful one, silversenior, because it is so completely circular. You and your H's parents were poor, but they raised children who came to understand the real value of education and money, that they free us to make choices. Of all the ways you could have cashed in your hard work and private school degrees, you both chose to help people like your parents, so that maybe their kids could have choices, too. And the really beautiful thing is that your own boys have been able to watch this acted out over their lifetimes. They've seen the choices between (probably) paying for the grandparents to fly out and an expensive summer camp opportunity. They've seen Mom and Dad's cars compared to some of their friends. But they've also heard the stories around the dinner table about your clients, and these have shaped them more, I would think, than any missed camp opportunity or luxury SUV.</p>
<p>So, give your oldest son this gift one more time. Let him choose the less expensive college because that is the wise and right thing to do for you and for him and for his little brother. Let him feel the world has a real edge to it, and that it's not (all of the sudden!) an ever-expanding, wishful-thinking dream-world where you three just somehow will pay for it all later. You didn't raise him to think this way because you and your H value a whole different set of criteria. Don't change on him now after 18 years. As anxiousmom said above, the guilt of knowing you are so far in debt would probably weigh heavily on a kid like him. And it seriously might tempt him to choose a career that doesn't call him or honor his gifts, if only to help his parents get out of "poverty." That would be pretty ironic, right?</p>