Finalizing list of schools for student interested in Physics

We’re working to get to a final list of schools for my son, and wanted to get feedback from the folks here. I’ve been on this site for a few years now, starting with my older son’s college search (he’s now studying CS at UIUC), and have been following things more closely the last year or so, trying to pick up things that would be helpful for my younger son, who will be a senior this coming fall. So we’ve been through this once, but it’s going to be very different this time around, since my younger son’s interests and preferences are so different. I’ve amassed quite a list of schools to consider – way too many :-), so mostly I’m interested in cutting that list down, but I’m still open to hearing about schools we may not have considered.

Apologies in advance for the length of this post, but I’m trying to include all the relevant information.

About my son: He’s very strong academically – I don’t know his exact GPA, not sure exactly how his school calculates it, but he’s got just one B so far, the rest A’s, taking a rigorous courseload; his school doesn’t do rank; he scored a 36 on the ACT; and he scored well enough on the PSAT to be a strong NM candidate. He’s a strong writer, and, judging by their responses at PTCs, his teachers like him, so I expect his essays and letters of reference to be strong.

As to his extra-curriculars, they’re more average, particularly relative to his academic achievements. His biggest EC is music – he plays the viola, and as well as playing in a variety of community orchestras, he’s achieved All-State each year in high school. Otherwise, he’s got a variety of activities, nothing real consistent, deep, or accomplished – one sports team for four years, another for two; some math and science competitions, a number of other clubs and activities at school, and he’s got a job this summer (which may continue on).

He’s interested in studying physics, and realizes that will likely require going on to grad school and getting a Ph.D. But his interests are fairly broad – he’s not just a math/science kid – so he would like a school where he can explore a variety of subjects (although he’s not interested in double-majoring).

He’s interested in small- to medium-sized schools. Some of the common descriptors apply to his preferences: quirky, liberal, collaborative, open, not mainstream. He likes playing games (all kinds – computer/video games, board games, RPG). Some of the things he talks about are being able to find a group he can play the kinds of games he likes with, and finding people that he can have deep/interesting conversations with on a variety of subjects and classes.

Geographically, he’s looking in the midwest, northeast, and west. He’s fairly open as to location and weather, although he would prefer the school be near or in a decent-sized city (but he doesn’t really like being in the midst of a big city). He’s not interested in sports, and wants a school with little/no greek life, and no religious affiliation (except perhaps Quaker). He’d be perfectly happy at a LAC, although preferably one with interesting things going on in science and physics in particular.

We live in Illinois, so UIUC is a natural choice. In fact, it’s a good comparison point, because he’s almost certain to get in, and it’s affordable for us. And, we can’t really afford much more than that, so any school with a net cost much more than UIUC’s in-state cost will likely not be feasible.

As to our financial situation, we’re middle income (with no unusual circumstances, like owning a business), and can expect at least some financial aid at schools with only need-based aid. Whether it will be enough is unclear, and will depend on the school. We’ve run a few NPCs, and in some cases, the net cost was doable, and in others not. (We will run the NPCs again, as part of the process of finalizing the list.) I also expect that my son can get good merit aid at a number of schools, and that may get the net cost down to around the level of UIUC’s cost. So we are trying to include schools known for good merit aid on the list.

This gets to one of the tricky points of this search. My son would much prefer not to go to UIUC – it’s too close, and doesn’t really match what he’s looking for in a school. So we’re really trying to find an affordable alternative.

Another important point: My son is smart and he’s a hard worker, but he’s not super intense. So he’s already cut some of the schools known to be very intense (e.g., Caltech, Reed). But some other schools in that category are still on the list, because he’s gathered from what he’s read that they still allow for other activities and a life outside of classes. I can appreciate his not wanting to go to one of these super intense schools; still, I feel that he’ll best be served by going to a school with smart, hard-working, motivated, ambitious students. So we’d like to find a school that has that, while not being too intense.

So, on to the schools we’re considering. These are organized roughly by what category I think they fall into for my son (e.g., reach, match). I don’t want to get sidetracked into discussion about whether I’ve miscategorized any, but if you feel any are way off, let me know. For now I haven’t really included any pure safeties – we may add one or two of those (e.g., Truman State or UMN-Morris). A ‘*’ indicates we’ve visited the school (and while we’d like to visit many more of these schools, it’s not clear that will be possible). And we’re also aware that for many of these schools, showing interest is an important factor.

reach: Amherst, Brown, Harvey Mudd, Pomona, Stanford, Swarthmore, U Chicago*, Williams

high match: Bates, Carleton, Grinnell, Hamilton, Haverford, Middlebury, Tufts, Vassar, Wash U, Wesleyan

match: Case Western, Oberlin, Rochester

low match: Dickinson, Earlham, Kalamazoo, Lawrence, Lewis and Clark, Occidental, Puget Sound, Skidmore, Willamette, Wooster, UIUC

At this point, he’s nowhere near having a clear first choice (although he’d probably name U Chicago if asked – and yes, he knows about their essays, it’s one of the things about the school that intrigues him). Partly because of this – and also because finances are a big consideration – we’re not currently planning on his applying anywhere ED (but yes to EA, so hopefully he can get some early acceptances in the bank).

So, again, feel free to comment on any aspect of things mentioned in this post, but my primary purpose is to get close to a final list of schools. Comments on particular schools, or general strategies for pruning the list would be helpful.

Thanks!

I can only comment in general. I think you have some good choices there, certainly Haverford fits the bill for what you want. My S is studying physics and math at Bucknell and also wanting to go on to get a PhD. However, Bucknell does not sound like what your S wants - it has greek life and it is not what I would call quirky. In hindsight my D may have preferred a different school for some of the reasons you mention, but he is very happy at Bucknell and it has allowed him to work directly with professors from day one. He is doing summer research there. I think any of the smaller LACs you mention would offer the same experiences. So it sounds like it will be up to where he gets in and what is affordable.

Sounds like you have a clear idea of how to go about admissions and also the kind of environment where your S would thrive. Having gone thru it already with your older son will help. Our own rising junior sounds a lot like your student, and I will follow your thread with interest! You have a great working list.

My suggestion is to keep a strong middle and to shave off a few at the top and the bottom. S should be the one to do this. Have him pick his favorites from the high reaches and the low matches. Make sure HE is choosing. For example to me, as the non- LAC and with its crazy low admit rate, Stanford sticks out as one which could be cut. But – does your S love Stanford? Can he live with it if he never applies?

Similarly with the low reaches. Are there any that he knows he does not actually want to attend? Better to know that now and save the effort and cost of applying. You will want to lighten this list so that he can focus on the ones he likes best (demonstrated interest).

Based on supporting academic disciplines, some on your current list may be stronger than others. In mathematics, for example, Grinnell, Hamilton, Haverford and Carleton may be particularly strong (based on range of course offerings and percentages of majors). Bates, which doesn’t offer computer science (but which plans to offer “digital and computational studies”) may be relatively weaker in terms of complementary courses for a physics major. Haverford, at this point, appears to be a school which merits definite consideration. Grinnell, Hamilton, Amherst and Brown from your group should be noted for their open curricula, which may appeal to your son. Macalester is roughly as selective as your match schools and could be worth a look.

So Mudd , Swat, & UChicago are going to be super-intense, especially for a Physivs major. That said, Mudd in particular is “collaborative intense” – he will have a team of fellow students on the same track and very stong and individual faculty support. I’d give Carleton a boost due to strength in Physics – and consider putting Reed back in for that reason as well. Honestly, a kid with a 36 ACT and 3.95 is going to be somewhat bored and unchallenged at some of these schools. I don’t think he would be overwhelmed at Carleton, for example – but I don’t see a school like Earlham being a fit for four years.

Take this with a grain of salt since I’m an incoming freshman, but I chose Caltech over several of the schools on your sons list for computer science and didn’t feel it was significantly ''more intense" than schools like Harvey Mudd and UChicago. Caltech has a unique quirky culture that fits students that may not have been considered normal in high school. There are definitely opportunities to do things outside of STEM (I plan on double majoring in a humanity and playing a sport). My friend is a physics major at Vanderbilt and enjoys how small and friendly the environment is (I don’t know much about it though since I didn’t apply). You seem to have a lot of safety schools. You should be able to cut at least half of those (I regret falling into the trap of wasting money applying to too many safeties this year).

Sounds counter intuitive but students have been denied or waitlisted at schools which were too obvious as safeties if they did not show demonstrated interest. A 36 ACT with a correspondingly high GPA is a stand out. I appreciate advice learned on CC, namely start your final list from the bottom up. Define the low matches early on and show them lots of love.

@maria93101, it sounds like you have not actually started at CalTech yet. So it may be hard to judge. I do agree that a kid like the OP’s may really find his “tribe” at a school like CalTech or Mudd.

I have a friend who is studying Physics and is going to Ohio University under their Honors Tutorial College. The HTC runs on a Cambridge/Oxford-like system of small tutorial classes with one-on-one instruction with professors, and the students in the program get a lot of money to go study at Physics labs abroad and the like. I know the students in the Physics program end up going to very good grad schools too. She received very close to a full-ride there as well!

Definitely keep U Rochester on your list. He sounds like he’d have a decent chance at significant merit aid and would very likely find his tribe.

Based on what I know of U Chicago (little - not many data points, but believable data points), I would consider it intense so be wary if he says he likes it, but doesn’t want intense.

With respect to his setting preferences, this Newsweek article can be helpful for sorting: “The 25 Most Desirable Suburban Schools.” Urban and rural versions are also available. Note that some distinctions among these categories can be somewhat arbitrary.

Definitely take a look at Rhodes College in Memphis. Great reputation and lots of hands on ops. I think he would also qualify for merit aid there. Very holistic, they know their students. One of the Colleges That Change Lives.

@momcinco: Yes, I’ve tried to have my son do as much as possible (but sometimes that’s difficult :slight_smile: ). We actually started out with a list almost twice this size, most of which I had come up with. Then I had my son do some reading and research (mostly from a recent Fiske guide) to categorize schools by preference, and that’s what led to the current list (all the dropping from that huge list was based on his categories).

It was kinda interesting how Stanford got on there. At one point my son said, “Maybe I’ll apply to an Ivy.”; my response was, well, that’s fine if you want to consider such schools, but widen it to HYPSMC/super-elite schools, and read about them to see if they’re a good fit (and do the NPCs). So he did, and Stanford was the only one that remained. It could come off on another round of cutting, I’m not sure actually where it stood.

I agree we have too many low matches, so that’s one place we can cut. We’ll probably look at size/repute of the Physics dept., how strong they are with merit aid, and where they were in my son’s preference categories.

@merc81: Interesting comment about the open curricula. My son seems fine with more structured requirements (evidenced by his liking Chicago, which has “the core”); I think one can get good breadth with either some structure or something very open – but with the latter, one has to be more on top of things oneself (and/or have good advising). We may look at this further as we get deeper into the search.

@intparent: I appreciate the supportive comments, and I will bring this up with my son again. I think there’s something to what you say, in that the prospect of a school known to be so intense can be intimidating, especially initially, and it’s harder to see how things will be when he’s a junior/senior. Having friends he knows well can be helpful, because he can judge things by how they say they are. He does know kids at some of these places, but they tend to be only freshmen or sophomores.

@Creekland: What he says is that it’s not that he minds intensity, it’s just that there also has to be time for other activities, social life, and fun! At least based on what he’s read, some of these other schools have that.

Thanks for the responses, everyone; please keep them coming!

I am going to second Ohio University - Honors Tutorial College. Many of the physics grad go on to very good grad school placements. HTC flies under the radar for most high stat kids because of OU’s party school rep but it is truly an outstanding program. Close friend (OU HTC physics grad) who taught Physics at Princeton would also recommend U of MD - College Park and, oddly, Syracuse.

I am gonna bet Wooster and Puget Sound can come off the list. What about Carnegie Mellon or RPI for matches if you are also considering Case in the match pile?

I think that looking into the prospective maw of several years of graduate school - even should it have a stipend - makes the finances more important.

There’s a website with a list of schools that offer automatic full tuition scholarships for high stats, and I’d start there, probably with the Alabamas.

You might also look at Nebraska, Illinois Inst. of Tech (one of their physics profs posts here regularly) etc. The Midwest Student Exchange Program also has a site that lists participating schools. Many of these give nearly in-state tuition .

Finally, don’t be afraid to look west. Two national labs are in New Mexico, and they use “locally” produced scientists too. I think UNM, New Mexico State, and New Mexico Tech are all serious institutions and all should meet your cost goals. I’m sure there are others, bur I’ve taken classes from two of these and am comfortable discussing them. Bonus: NM Tech is on Mythbusters sometimes when they blow stuff up.

Since your son is interested in exploring a variety of fields, look carefully at what’s available, particularly at the smaller colleges. Personally, I think geosciences are really important as electives for students in any major (and their field trips can be great). An available astronomy major/minor is another good sign of breadth in the sciences. Anthropology consists of four major subfields, as does, typically, government; a college’s offerings in these areas should be strong and balanced. Creative writing courses may appeal to him. The presence of a free-standing art museum indicates a commitment to the visual arts.

I agree regarding your points on open curricula. Their freedom can be welcome, particularly after the structure of high school, but a student serious about acquiring an education should, ideally, create his own core even within that freedom.

Your son will get into a great college. Pretty much every college on his list should be there without much thought of compromise regarding ease of admission.

Ultimately, schools can cross categories with respect to appeal. A match may be more desirable across a variety of considerations than a reach, for example.

“Intense” translates to how much one is expected to learn. If your son wants to be admitted to a PhD program, he’ll be in competition with students from intense schools. If he is admitted by an intense school, he has already proved he can handle the load. To skip Master, he should write an undergrad thesis (to show grad schools he knows how to do original research and write about it); this is easier at a school where everyone is writing a required Master-level thesis.

I have read through most of the responses and just want to offer a perspective that I don’t think has been shared. First, a physics major is pretty intense just by its nature. Second, grad school requires LOR from the dept. Those 2 points really go together. Depts are going to select who they endorse for which grad school.

This post is prompted bc I was recently privy to a recent discussion about grad applications amg some students at a tippy top school. These were pretty amazing young people, all top students. Yet, within that dept, endorsements went to one individual per school. So hierarchy within the dept limited their grad school applications. (Two of the students had both investigated the same grad program, but only one received the dept’s endorsement. Yet, both students were amazing students and really qualified applicants.) I don’t know how it works at most schools, but after hearing their stories, I realized that it was not something we had really thought about. That said, we have not been through this process ourselves, *so if this information is misguided, I hope others will chime in and clarify. Maybe this situation was unique to that dept./i

Also, getting UG research opportunities can be competitive at some schools. Does he have the personality to make sure he is one of the students getting one of those coveted research positions? (UG research is vital for grad school.)

Those might be a couple of things to keep in mind as he considers depts. Physics is a tough major and the majority of the students are going to be strong academically. Finding academically-oriented peers in most physics depts is not going to be overly difficult. He might want to see how his personality and the dept’s personality match.

My kid’s experiences at a top LAC in Physics have not matched that – many good research opportunities (even for students not at the top of the class) and support for any student who wants to shoot for grad school, even if they are not the top student in the department.

@intparent That is probably one of the benefits of an LAC. My Ds did not apply to any LACs bc he had already completed 5 required physics UG classes and LACs didn’t offer enough coursework.

However, competitive research opportunities at some (I qualified my OP with the word some as well bc it isn’t true at all schools) research universities is not uncommon. He was told by one top dept that he already had more research experience than most of their UGs. (That made Ds run the other way. He had research experience as a high school student, but UG research was a priority for him.) At another he was told the the UG research opportunities were coveted positions and were limited in number.