<p>so I'm prolly just missing something someone already posted, but can EA admits access the FA awards yet and how? someone told me they were coming out in january and some other ppl said they had theirs already</p>
<p>You can check your award by logging into Axess and clicking “View Award”. There’s nothing there for me, yet.</p>
<p>i got mine on the “view award” thing about an hour after the acceptance email. i assume it would only be there if you submitted the css profile by the 15th, though</p>
<p>^^ same. says something like no self-service access. i submitted the profile by the 15th, too. any other confirmations on this “by january” thing? one person told me that and im not sure if its valid</p>
<p>Same here…my son tried to access his his award but there was nothing there. They promise to have these by 12/15 so perhaps they are still working on some and they’ll be out by Thursday. Our CSS was filed by the 15th also so just keep trying and if it doesn’t come out by Thursday, maybe contact the financial aid office.</p>
<p>The same thing happened last year; they’ll have the award letters on the day REA decisions were “supposed” to be released. :)</p>
<p>Congrats! Welcome to the Farm!!</p>
<p>Ok so I was admitted to the class of 2016 through REA, but I had no idea about this November 15th CSS Profile deadline. I didn’t even know what a CSS Profile deadline was until tonight (my councilors are fairly incompetent, not to make excuses for my own incompetence). </p>
<p>How screwed am I? Am I now ineligible for university financial aid? It says on their brochure that I can still submit it after the deadline but that my offer may not come in time for the deadline for my admissions reply date. Please help, this could jeopardize my future at Stanford and I’m freaking out!</p>
<p>From what I know, Stanford is need-blind to Americans. So if you’re one, then give them a call and you should be ok.</p>
<p>Yes I’m a US citizen, but I was under the impression that the university was need-blind for admissions, then financial aid was entirely based on need.</p>