<p>
[quote]
Barrons posted: Kluge, the states fund colleges, not the federal gov. Quit throwing out red herrings. The major thing the federal government funds at colleges is research and that funding has been booming.</p>
<p>When times were flush the states starting funding all sorts of nice programs that they could not afford when the tough times came. So they had to cut (unlike the federal gov.) and higher ed seemed to be a favorite place to cut. Don't like it--vote in another state government.
[/quote]
"Times were flush" from the 50's through the 70's, despite the cold war, Viet Nam, some severe recessions, etc. Suddenly, starting around 1980, we couldn't afford to fund higher education? Here's a few facts for you:
[quote]
UC 2006-2007 budget statement:
The State contributed about $15,500 to the cost of education for each UC general campus student in 1985, and now only contributes about $9,500 per student per year a 40% decline (figures in constant dollars).
[/quote]
And this report has some nice charts showing public college fees in California and other western states from the 70's through the 90's, illustrating the sudden start of increasing fees around 1980: <a href="http://www.ucop.edu/acadinit/mastplan/ProjectL.pdf%5B/url%5D">http://www.ucop.edu/acadinit/mastplan/ProjectL.pdf</a></p>
<p>I know that rightist ideologues like to try to separate out all the consequences from the quiet economic siege that the middle class has been under for the past twenty-five years, but they have grown too large to ignore any more. When California's new Governator cut taxes by $5 billion (a motor vehicle tax) as his first act in office in 2003 (when the state was running a $15 billion deficit) he practically dislocated his shoulder patting himself on the back. The Chamber of Commerce continues to crow over this fine action by Schwartzenegger. UC fees were hiked 14% that year - and another 8% the following year. Vote in another state government? California, for all its faults, still does a better job than most states.</p>
<p>It's not a "times were flush" vs. "times are tough" thing. We short education in good times and bad - and we have no choice because the tax dollars aren't there. State, federal, local; income tax, property tax, sales tax, ultimately all public services - including education - are paid from tax dollars. The quiet shift of the tax burder from the wealthy to the poor and middle class over the past 25 years is not limited to federal taxation. More and more state revenue comes from sales taxes - which are regressive - and less and less from property value taxes - which tend to be progressive. The tax cut campaigns are slick and seductive, and anyone who dares to point out that you can't get something for nothing is savaged as a "tax and spend liberal."</p>
<p>Its a complex subject, but ignoring the correlation between the decline in financial contribution to the common good by the extremely wealthy and the increase in costs to everyone else is naive - and college costs is a prime example of the multiple processes which continue to shift more and more of the nation's wealth from the poor and middle class to the extremely wealthy.</p>