<p>i don't even know how many colleges i'm applying to</p>
<p>it's somewhere between 20-22.
i'm probably going to visit the top few schools that I get into (yes, top few, more or less based on US news) then base my decision on which one i like best.</p>
<p>i don't see much of an issue with my approach at all. i applied to a lot of reaches to maximize my chances of getting in. if i do get in, for the next four years, i will be surrounded by smarter people, which will in tern influence me (in a good way i hope), and my future connections will be (in general) more successful. </p>
<p>Before someone attacks me I will try and reinforce my approach. First of all, no one can deny that going to a better school is a good thing. </p>
<p>Do not deny that the average kid at harvard is smarter, yes SMARTER, than the average kid at johns hopkins. Do not deny that the average kid at jhu is, in turn, SMARTER than the average kid at boston college.</p>
<p>the key word here is average, but in any case, my point is, better college ---> better future. "not necessarily", you say. Of course not necessarily; nothing is definite, and of course it is the individual and what she is capable of that matters the most, but even if what college you went to makes a 1% difference, it is worth it. Indeed, the average harvard graduate is more sucessful than the average jhu blah blah blah. </p>
<p>there's my reasoning for shooting for a good school. not necessarily a prestigious one, but the one where my peers will be smartest.</p>
<p>next, onto fit. i live in massachusetts. i have pretty much lived here my whole life, but i am open minded. i've moved 13 times in my life, and never have i foudn a place where i felt miserable and that id rather be somewhere else. A person like me, i am convinced, would be happy wherever she ends up. </p>
<p>that said, let us not take personal fit out of the picture. obviously, it is important to like the school you attend. but honestly, with so many top colleges, do you expect someone to visit every single one and decide whether they like it before they apply? does it not make more sense to apply to them first, let them tell YOU what your options are, and THEN spend $500 per school flying over and checking out the schools that have accepted you? if they don't like the school, they wont go. it's that simple.</p>
<p>this is my mindset. i want to go to a good school. since i'm an optimistic, open minded person, i think i would be happy anywhere (if not, i'm too young to know). therefore, i'm going to the best school i get into.</p>
<p>now, onto the 'fairness' of applying to so many schools. it's a competitive world, and i'm looking after my own hide. now, i'm not saying i don't care about others, but let's face it, the past 200 years of american history has been built on competitive capitalism, and it has brought us pretty far. think of this as a business. if there are a lot of competitors in the market, the price goes down, which may drive some people out of the market. boohoo for them. the remaining competitors then try and do all kinds of things, including improving their product, to remain competitive. what do you get in the end? a better product at a lower price for your customer. </p>
<p>for all those who went bankrupt, pick up the pieces and soldier on elsewhere. for those who lost a spot because i applied to 20 schools, you didn't get in because you didn't deserve it. if you worked harder, if you trained harder, if you were smarter, you would have gotten in. you alone are responsible for your rejection, not i, who was more qualified.</p>
<p>as a side note, i probably won't even get into any of my reaches. i'm not being narcissistic here, just honest.
what a long post. i should sleep.</p>