Fox News is Tanking

<p>I never said you couldn't discuss this, but you are attacking me. I'm not going to put up with that. There's a difference between discussing and attacking other people because they have different beliefs. </p>

<p>I'm uninformed?? LMFAO. Ok. </p>

<p>How about I watch Fox News, CNN, MSNBC and the American version of Al-Jazeera (yes, you probably didn't know that there's an English version of it)? </p>

<p>I read the Christian Science Monitor, NYT, Washington Post, The Detroit Free Press, etc? </p>

<p>How about....I've been talking to a serviceman (who served 10 years) who has fought in the War in Iraq, as well as Afghanistan? </p>

<p>How about...I'm in a National Diversity and Change class in college and I've taken Social Differentiation and Inequality? </p>

<p>Like I said before, quit while you're behind. You know nothing about me.</p>

<p>I wish you could come out from behind your computer screen so I can quiz you on how much you know about different viewpoints without the aid of the internet. </p>

<p>Sidebar: It's pretty sad how out of a college class of 300 students, I was the only one who was able to correctly identify that Herbert Hoover was the president before FDR. I honestly hope that you do know about American History and current affairs. :)</p>

<p>
[quote]
American version of Al-Jazeera (yes, you probably didn't know that there's an English version of it)?

[/quote]

You are so incredibly Lame</p>

<p>
[quote]
Who was the producer of OUTFOXED? If it's made by a nonpartisan organization/person, then I will watch it. If not, what was this person's axe to grind?

[/quote]

Guess what, it’s done by a liberal. Why would a liberal have a problem with Fox if they were so fair and balanced?
Nevertheless, even if it has an ax to grind (which is doesn’t), it uses actual memos and footage that you can decipher for your exceptionally informed self.
It’s not the end all to why Fox is conservative but I would recommend watching; you wouldn't want to be uninformed!</p>

<p>*nbachris2788: So you're a hedonistic aristocratic bigot?</p>

<p>Nah, I'm just j/k.*</p>

<p>I believe the correct terminology is libertarian. =)</p>

<p>LAST POST! Boo yah!</p>

<p>Angljc1-</p>

<p>Look, I'm not going to argue with you ok? I don't have time to argue with someone who calls me "lame" over the internet. (I also have more important things to worry about like my midterm exams). If you think I'm lame, that's fine because I really don't care what someone who doesn't know me thinks. If you have to resort to name-calling to prove your point, that shows me you are immature and you need to grow up. I'm not going to take your opinions seriously when you are coming off as a wiseacre instead of a true scholar. </p>

<h2>If you honestly believe that I'm uninformed, then so be it. I know the truth and the people who know me know the truth. You're not going to convince me with your posts, and I'm not going to convince you with mine...so just drop the argument. </h2>

<p>Since I'm in a good mood after fingerpainting today (stress reliever my RA offerred) I will say this: </p>

<p>Good luck with your endeavors and even though your views differ from mine, I'm glad that you care about the future of this nation and the world. A lot of people (especially in college), don't.</p>

<p>Peace.</p>

<p>we win.</p>

<p>101010101010</p>

<p>You win? I never thought it was a competition. I thought it was a discussion, hence the forum College Confidential Cafe. </p>

<p>Getting through midterms is my prerogative right now, not arguing with a bunch of immature high school kids. Learn to think for yourselves.</p>

<p>I meant we win the argument.</p>

<p>I am not in high school. :)</p>

<p>I'm not either. </p>

<p>And you're a n00b, you weren't even in on the discussion, so no "you" didn't win. </p>

<p>And no, I didn't lose an "argument". I don't have time to argue with people who repeat what the MSM/Mommy/Daddy/teachers say like sheep.</p>

<p>I was but I got deleted</p>

<p>I pity you if you think you "won" the argument. If you really are into politics, you should know that one side cannot be truly correct. </p>

<p>For example, abortion. There is no correct viewpoint, or else we wouldn't continue to have debates about it.</p>

<p>I enjoyed having this discussion with you guys. Remember, if you don't stand up for your country and what you believe in, who will? It's nice that you guys are so passionately involved in political issues, whatever your views are.</p>

<p>Why are you equating abortion to this issue? </p>

<p>FOX NEWS HAS AN AGENDA.
It’s not like there are any shades of gray. It is a factual statement not one of opinion. There is a correct answer.</p>

<p>I might've missed it, but...what is the argument exactly?</p>

<p>FOX NEWS HAS AN AGENDA.</p>

<p>and oh ya, we won. ( I am half joking)</p>

<p>The politics of news. What I'm saying is that we're arguing about something that is purely based on opinion.</p>

<p>CNN HAS AN AGENDA ALSO. EVERY NEWS OUTLET DOES. </p>

<p>It's funny how I ended the argument and wished everyone well, and yet you gloat like a 12 year old kid. Come on now, we're all mature young adults, are we not?</p>

<p>Fox News is fiercely Republican.</p>

<p>CNN is crazy Liberal.</p>

<p>The BBC is just generally hated.</p>

<p>And people wondered why I stopped watching the news.</p>

<p>edit: haha. ^ we just both brought up cnn.</p>

<p>But yeah -- isn't it just...a widely accepted fact that there's no real bipartisan news stations out there?</p>

<p>Just let the thread die. Taggart is right. Every network has an agenda. Can we agree on that?</p>

<p>I hate the news. I love video games FTW!</p>

<p>Does anyone have Sega Genesis? I miss playing Sonic. :(</p>

<p>Agreed, let it be.</p>