Let’s not start falsely and anonymously accusing people you disagree with of invidious motives.
Nothing about Free Harvard, Fair Harvard is remotely “racist”; it is not about affirmative action but free tuition and transparency in admissions.
Harvard magazine (affiliated with Harvard), Harvard Law Record (affiliated with Harvard Law School) and the New York Times have written about or published articles about Mr. Unz and the Free Harvard initiative without the need to falsely disparage the guy.
https://harvardmagazine.com/2016/01/overseers-petitioners-challenge-harvard-policies
http://hlrecord.org/author/ronunz/
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/15/us/a-push-to-make-harvard-free-also-questions-the-role-of-race-in-admissions.html
Let’s keep in mind too that he went on record opposing opposing the cutting off social services to immigrants in California.
If you have donated to Harvard, then your money is being used to “fund” education for “wealthy white people” (your words, not mine. The endowment funds Harvard, whose student body is disproportionately wealthy (many of whom are also white). Increasing SES diversity at Harvard would change that.
What’s a better compounded growth rate to use for projecting future growth in Harvard’s endowment?