I thought it would be a good idea to bring up this discussion again as a few of my circumstances have changed.
For anyone unaware of what I’m talking about here is a previous discussion: http://talk.qa.collegeconfidential.com/international-baccalaureate-ib/2038964-full-ib-necessity-p1.html
I’m now in my Junior year and was Full IB, but am no longer pursuing that diploma. It was not rigor issue, in fact I can now say that much of what was being said about the course load felt like fear-mongering. Regardless, I was starting to realize that I had classes coming up that I really had no interest in taking and never really cared about the diploma so I dropped the Full IB track right before my 3rd Trimester of Junior Year began. Part of this decision was that I doubted my standardized tests would not be good enough to get into the top schools that I felt this rigor would be necessary for. I was wrong though and did much better then I thought I would with a 32 on the ACT. My question becomes: will I get screwed in the rigor department when it comes to applying to colleges next year? I’m still taking the full IB track with the exception of TOK and IB Spanish. Recently, I was told I would still be fine in the rigor department when it comes to schools like Notre Dame (my dream school). Is there any truth to this? I’m just wondering if anyone really knows where I stand with this. Ant help would be greatly appreciated.
Note: For further reference to my academic profile, this thread can be referenced: http://talk.qa.collegeconfidential.com/college-search-selection/2115981-help-me-with-my-college-search.html#latest