<p>
[quote]
When you say this, do you mean that the employment prospect for an engineer (ChemE specifically) would be more advantageous than, say, the employment prospect of a bio major wanting to teach high school, or a postdoc to seek for a tenure-track position at a 4 year university?
[/quote]
</p>
<p>Exactly. That's because an engineering graduate can also go teach high school (i.e. in math or science) if he wants to. An engineer grad can also ultimately obtain a PhD (and not necessarily in engineering, but perhaps in a completely different field) and then try to become a tenured academic. For example, Vernon Smith earned his BS in EE from Caltech, and then later earned a PhD in economics from Harvard, and ultimately ended up winning the Nobel Prize in Economics in 2002. </p>
<p>Hence, one could say that an engineering degree provides a superset of the possibilitoes of other degrees. Those with engineering degrees can do what those with most other bachelor's degrees can do, but the reverse is not true. Again, I stress the point that you are not required to work as an engineer if you have an engineering degree. Plenty decide to pursue other ventures. What the degree does is give you a wide range of choices. </p>
<p>
[quote]
1.Is that true? I just suppose that because engineering programs (ABET accredited) are the most challenging ones, so hard work usually pays off. I just don't know how much advantage an engineering degree will give.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>Careful with the accreditation motif. Just because a program is not accredited does not mean it is unrigorous. Some extremely rigorous and highly respected engineering degrees are not ABET-accredited. For example, bioengineering at Berkeley is not accredited. Neither is materials science & engineering at Berkeley or Stanford. </p>
<p>ABET accreditation matters only in certain fields, notably CivE, and to a lesser extent ME, ChemE, and perhaps EE. Newer fields, like bioengineering and MSE, are not certified by any of the states, which renders accreditation effectively meaningless. There is no such thing as a state-certified Professional BioEngineer. Hence, it doesn't really matter whether your bioengineering degree is accredited or not. There are some no-name schools that offer ABET-accredited bioengineering programs, but I would not choose one of them over Berkeley just because of the accreditation. </p>
<p>
[quote]
don't know about "the Internet" per se, but I was under the impression that the World Wide Web was actually invented by European scientists (Briton Tim Berners-Lee and Belgian Robert Cailluau ) while working at CERN in Geneva, Switzerland. </p>
<p>I must be wrong though. Every American knows Al Gore invented the Internet (as he once claimed !).
[/quote]
</p>
<p>Uh, no, the Internet was actually indeed invented by Americans. The Internet (known as the Arpanet back then) began life in the 1960's as a project within DARPA in the Department of Defense, and the original Arpanet connected 4 schools (Stanford, University of Utah, UCLA, UCSB). </p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arpanet#Background_of_the_ARPANET%5B/url%5D">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arpanet#Background_of_the_ARPANET</a></p>
<p>The WWW was indeed started by Tim Berners-Lee - but as an overlay of the Internet, and specifically, as a way to communicate HTML (Web) pages over the Internet. But the Internet is not, and has never been, just about the Web. Some of the original uses of the Internet (Arpanet) were for remote time-sharing of computer systems. But the 'killer app' of the Internet/Arpanet was obviously (and probably still is) email. Email existed separately from, and was invented years before, the WWW. Another extremely popular use of the Internet even today is obviously the remote sharing of files, i.e. today's (usually illegal) sharing of audio and video clips. Again, that has nothing to do with the WWW.</p>