Gazette Article / Statistics

<p>An interesting article about admissions in the official JHU newspaper :
<a href="http://www.jhu.edu/%7Egazette/2005/04apr05/04admit.html%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://www.jhu.edu/~gazette/2005/04apr05/04admit.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p>

<p>"E-mail notifications were ... sent out Thursday morning. The Admissions Office staff pressed the "send" button and began watching Internet message boards where students post college-related information. It took just three minutes for a Johns Hopkins posting to appear."</p>

<p>... It seems we're being watched! Not a surprise, but amusing to see confirmation in an official publication. </p>

<p>Some numbers: </p>

<p>Of 11,290 applicants (I'm assuming both ED and RD) 3,538 were accepted, or just over 31%. There were 364 ED acceptances. There are 30 Baltimore Scholars in the class of 2009. The target enrollment is 1,082. </p>

<p>"...the university had the strongest applicant pool in its history, and it had accepted more students than ever in the three traditionally underrepresented minority groups — African American, Hispanic and Native American."</p>

<p>o wow... coool</p>

<p>i'm a hopkins student ambassador ... adcoms told us that they watch collegeconfidential very closely</p>

<p>"...the university had the strongest applicant pool in its history, and it had accepted more students than ever in the three traditionally underrepresented minority groups — African American, Hispanic and Native American."</p>

<p>I bleed Democrat blue and for a long time, I had agreed with affirmative action. Since the whole college process and getting decisions, one of which was a rejection from JHU, I have to say that I can no longer support AA. To think that I was more qualified than many others but they were the ones getting accepted simply because of their skin color or ethnicity gets under my skin a bit. I'm even more disappointed that JHU is not need-blind and rejects students based on their family's income, but that has nothing to do with the thread and is a debate for another day. Cheers.</p>

<p>Oh wonderful. The moment anything happens to touch YOU, it changes your perception. Says a lot for your thinking powers, logic, idealism. Just because you are personally shafted by a policy does not make it right or wrong. Policies are not win, win for everyone. Someone generally loses. The true test of a thinker is someone who rise above the personal issues.</p>

<p>Why don't you start another thread for this important (but off topic) conversation, possibly in the cafe area?</p>

<p>Jamimom, I'm only human, not to mention a 17 year old that is still developing a mind, opinions, etc. I never knew changing an opinion after experiencing something first hand is a crime, even something that is frowned upon. I guess you have never changed your opinion on an issue after you personally experienced it...</p>

<p>Says a lot about YOUR personality - being so judgmental.</p>

<p>I dont have a problem with affirmative action as long as there is not a quota...There is absolutely nothing wrong with taking race into consideration as long as it is not the only factor in admissions (as it could be with a quota.)</p>

<p>Besides, I took the blame for my rejections/waitlists...to be qute honest, I did not study as much or work as hard as I could have/should have in high school...</p>

<p>Back to topic...The one thing that I noticed is the seemingly low matriculation rate (700/3200)...about 20%...</p>

<p>So is Stanford (which really over does it with the Mexicans).</p>

<p>uhhhh Barry D. not all hispanics are Mexicans. Have you seen numbers for Mexicans at Stanford? Or have you just seen figures for the Hispanic population?</p>