<p>
</p>
<p>This is what I’ve been trying to tell you. The whole college of engineering has changed a lot this year, but this policy of not letting students move on without meeting certain gates (that were very similar in prior years) is not a change.</p>
<p>What has changed is that 2014-2015 freshmen, for the first time, entered the Dwight Look School without being accepted into their majors. It’s true that they must be accepted into their majors prior to enrolling in certain courses.</p>
<p>But in all practicality, students from many prior years have had to deal with similar restrictions – they were enrolled as “lower division” students and had to complete Common Body of Knowledge requirements with certain course grades and GPA’s prior to moving on to “upper division” courses and being fully accepted into their majors. </p>
<p>Most, if not all, prior years’ engineering freshmen had to complete their lower division requirements in no more than 3 full semesters or leave their departments. This year’s freshmen have to be accepted into an engineering major by the end of their 4th semester or leave the college of engineering. Fairly similar.</p>
<p>For decades, tamu’s engineering students have been prohibited from moving on to what are basically “upper division courses” until certain requirements are met. It’s not new.</p>
<p>My son accepted 34 of his AP credits as an incoming freshman and was up against the same sort of restriction. We saw the guidelines that prohibited early advancement and never even considered that he should warrant special treatment. In fact, I made the opposite assumption. I assumed that there were lots of freshman engineering students who had lots of AP credits, great grades, sophomore classification, and the desire to press ahead. And I still think that way. (And I think that some of their parents are here on CC with us! haha) There are a LOT of very focused, very driven engineering students. </p>
<p>My son stayed within the guidelines, picked up an interesting minor, took advantage of some other great opportunities (academic and otherwise), rearranged the standard 4-year-plan where he could, and entered the Fast Track Program when the time came. Your son will be able to do the same.</p>
<p>I guess more power to you for trying to beat the system, but with or without MEEN 221 next semester, your son’s micro-group of like-minded, like-graded peers will all end up with pretty similar 3rd and 4th year schedules and those 3rd and 4th year schedules will be pretty similar to their department’s 4-year degree plan. There will be differences, but the “skeletons” will remain the same. That’s just how the system works. And it does work. The people who work in the school of engineering seem to know a thing or two!</p>
<p>I hope your son has an outstanding second semester to match his first!</p>