@SOSConcern, Slackbot’s creator was just on Forbes saying that Liberal Arts majors may be “in”, though personally I wouldn’t totally bet on everyone accepting his reasoning. He makes a good sales pitch for a humanities major in a teach field, but I don’t think many people will buy it. I’ll probably check in on that student debt article too. I love his argument, it’s one that I’ve used against EVERYONE in my grade and extended family about wishing to major in history. “You’re a smart kid, why are you wasting your potential. / What the hell does someone do in a history major? / Why are you taking the blowoff path?”
Congrats to Slackbot guy! No one seems to understand that the humanities and social sciences are about more than just specific job-related skills. Yes, it’d be mighty difficult to find a job dealing with history or politics. It’s not that hard to find a job requiring analysis, critical thinking, argumentation/debate, research, and defense of said research. That’s what they teach.
I’ll end the tangent there.
I like Forbes ratings more than US News (Is that blasphemy here? Sorry) because it measures outcomes, not inputs. I disagree with schools being “better” simply by being selective. To me, it’s the education quality, career placement, and the student reviews that determine whether or not it’s a worthwhile institution. Both Niche and USNW’s rankings weight percentage admission into their academic ratings. I use Niche for admissions info and student reviews, Naviance for continued “chancing”, and requesting information, and US News for ABSOLUTELY NOTHING.
I’m surprised Marquette appears here, though, the discrepancy may be due to its relatively high acceptance rate vs schools of similar caliber, leading to lower ratings from other sources.
Another part of this choice has to be whether or not it would be efficient to double major. UA will give me 20 credits if I do as well as projected next year. 20 credits, while not incredible, is fairly significant in that it facilitates more advanced classes (saves me so much time!). Compare that to Whitman or Reed where there are comps in your major, or Grinnell and Carleton who have earned a reputation for rigor. In those top LACs, a double major may not be as practical, I’m in the process of investigating just how much harder these schools would be, but that’s hard since a student at a state school is unlikely to experience such a school’s classwork, and vice versa. Though Alabama and similar schools are the opposite of what I was looking for in a school, the opportunity to squeeze much more coursework out of them is appealing.
As a side note, the X-Percentile / X-GPA bottlenecks on merit scholarships are so frustrating! Take the College of Wooster for example, I’m 5 points, FIVE (!!!) past Wooster’s $27k/yr. scholarship, but cannot get it because I’m not in the top 15%.
Thanks for the continued input. I hope college isn’t as difficult as finding one! XD
@PurpleTitan, I’ve spoken to the ad-officer from Mt. Allison. It looks promising! I’d hate to be all the way up in New Brunswick, but it’s so compelling. I cannot exactly hold my breath for admissions though, seems a bit competitive, though certainly not as much as some of the U.S.'s elites. Both Earlham and Beloit look interesting on second glance. Early in my search, when I was much more dependent upon the college ranking websites, it appears I had crossed both out because of their academic rankings. I’ll look into their career placement and student experience, but Fiske’s Guide treats them much more lovingly. I will have to investigate both, but, while I’d prefer rural, Earlham appears to offer better job placement at first-glance. Thanks for returning!
@Overtheedge, thanks for commenting. The South is trying too hard. Something’s up. Kinda’ strange that so many schools South of the Mason-Dixon are offering so much aid. That being said, I’ll definitely look into those schools.
I do believe this is my longest post yet, oh Lord.