<p>sorry, this may be long but i'm really worried</p>
<p>i took US history SAT and got 380. i got 560 in math 2 (i could only finish half of the test) and 670 in physics. i know these r not good scores and i'm going to re-take math and physics in the fall, since i wasn't prepared last time.</p>
<p>i'm going to apply to UC's, and i know they only look at my 2 best subject tests scores, but they will still see my history test score. </p>
<p>i'm a straight A student and i don't think my school inflates the grades, since about half of the students failed this US history class. but anyway, i'm a student from a broad and i suck in history. what we studied in the class wasn't covered in the test. and i don't feel like retaking it, i dont think my score will improve if i retake it. </p>
<p>what will the colleges think when i got A's and A+'s but my history score is only 380!? T_T.. </p>
<p>i'm just worried if this 380 will affect my application.</p>
<p>Is there any way you can compare your score to the grades and scores of other students in the class? That would really be the only way to get perspective. Also, how spefically did the test differ from the course?</p>
<p>My teacher didn't really go into details. We hardly discussed about early centuries at all. And he focused on the 19 hundreds. And the the stuff we studied didn't appear in the test :S</p>
<p>You misbubbled. That's the only possible explanation. There is no way you actually took a class about US history and scored a 380 (even if it only covered the 1900s). A 380 is approximately equal to a raw score of 3. If you left every single question on the test blank, you would get around a 360 (maybe a 380 if the curve was a litte more generous than usual).</p>
<p>i would either explain it to colleges as a bubbling error or get the AMSCO book and study like crazy for October. You can decide although the latter probably looks better.</p>
<p>Yeah, just buy a couple of history subject test books and study for a couple of weeks...</p>
<p>I think that your history teacher is not teaching history... maybe he/she's focussing on something completely different... like north pole's history or something...</p>
<p>If you are a striaght A student, you should do fine...</p>
<p>But your school's grades do seem inflated considering your other subject test scores.</p>
<p>i posted like 3 questions on yahoo lol. in the other subjects there were also topics that we didn't cover in the class. but the tests didn't seem that hard. but the history test was hard. my problem was mainly the timing. i left 25 questions blank on the math test and skipped a lot of questions on the physics test, but i'm ordering the prep books now so i can work on full-length tests. </p>
<p>btw, do i need a real history textbook then? or should i just get perp books to study.</p>
<p>I think there's some way to get your test book sent to you or rechecked (for money, of course). With a score like that, you might want to consider it - it's quite possible you bubbled wrong or something else.</p>
<p>I don't know. But in this class not so many ppl got A's. the teacher never used the textbook. we didn't have final exams, we had to do big projects instead, which didn't help us learn much. well, for the whole 2nd semester we only studied the second half of the 1900s. we just watched videos (the american times and movies about e.g. vietnam war) most of the time and took notes, and we never had exams, not even small quizes. a large portion of the grade comes from the essays he assigned us for hw. a lot of people failed this class because they didn't turn in their works. also, the students I know who had classes with this teacher hated him. lol.</p>