Grade my essay please? :)

<p>I wrote a SAT essay based on the following topic:</p>

<p>"A mistakenly cynical view of human behaviour holds that people are primarily driven by selfish motives; the desire for wealth, for power or for fame. Yet history gives us many examples of individuals who have sacrificed their own welfare for a cause or a principle that they regarded as more important than their own lives. Conscience--that powerful inner voice that tells us what is right or what is wrong--can be a more compelling force than money, power or fame."</p>

<p>-> Is conscience a more powerful motivator than money, fame or power?</p>

<p>My essay (22min):</p>

<p>No, I do not believe that conscience is a more powerful motivator as compared to money, fame and power. It is true that there are a few people whose morals are strong enough to resist the lure of a materialistic life, but these people are merely peppered into history like needles in a haystack. In a society governed by “survival of the fittest”, the majority of us seek to elevate ourselves through money or fame or power.</p>

<p>We only need to look at history to see that a large number of people, even the world’s numerous leaders, are motivated by any of the three, especially power. World War II(WWII) is an excellent example of a case of needless bloodshed initiated by greed. Germany began its invasion into countries because of three main reasons--to build a German Empire in Europe, to let the Aryan race dominate and to take revenge on other European countries for its humiliating defeat in World War I. Driven by visions of ruling Europe, Hitler sent millions of soldiers out onto the battlefield to engage in combat. Over the course of WWII, countless people of multiple nationalities were sacrificed by the sake of one man’s lust for power. The ironic thing is, World War I had been labelled as “the war to end all wars”. Evidently, it is impossible for humanity to uproot its core nature. The large majority of human beings are driven by money, fame or power.</p>

<p>Moreover, for a long time now, it has been impossible to survive without money. Even those who have no means of finding a healthy income support themselves through begging. Recently, I watched an episode of Scam City, in which the narrator explores the streets of New Delhi, India to discover how the begging industry operates. He came across a group of “traffic light beggars” who wait for red lights to sell various doohickeys such as sunglasses or roses. A woman whom the narrator interviewed mourned her six-year-old child who had been run over by a car during a begging session. But what choice did she have? In order to earn money to support herself and the rest of her children, she suppressed her conscience and continued to send her children to potential death. </p>

<h2>In conclusion, conscience is, as a whole, not a more powerful motivator than money, fame or power. The former may be the voice that guides us towards morally right situations, but the smell of the latter is what lures us towards success. And for most humans, success is what we ultimately aim for. </h2>

<p>Thank you! Please grade it from 2-12 and tell me where I went wrong!</p>

<p>Your third paragraph is bad, but I’ll still let you have a 5/6.</p>

<p>So um, how can I improve it?</p>

<p>I like your writing style- the conversational way it opens with “No, I do not believe…” the use of “Moreover” as a bridge and the appositive in the conclusion. I think you have a good base to build from. </p>

<p>I continue to find it amusing when students take the prompt that practically scream for you to agree with it and adopt the opposite as their thesis. I have a feeling that if the Beatitudes were ever used as a prompt, half the foreign students would take the opposite in all sincerity. Oh well just amusing to me; CB isnt supposes to care which side you adopt. </p>

<p>The logic of your examples I find a bit dicey. Lets suppose we cede the fact Hitler, Mussolini and Stalin’s base motivations caused WWII. Are you really saying that that war didnt provide countless counterexamples of people acting selflessly, against their own monetary interests to help others effected by the war? Why we only have to think of Rick Blaine letting Ilsa get on the plane with Victor Laszlo. I would have preferred you use a much more specific example if you were going to reference WWII- maybe French collaboration or something similar. Being more specific allows you to diffuse the counter argument by claiming that more French were collaborators, or at least went along with occupation, than were in the Resistance. </p>

<p>In the case of Scam City is this really a clear example of putting personal gain ahead of conscience? It seems like the mother was trying to provide for the family, so maybe it is demonstrating the opposite of what your thesis is. If she had been pocketing all of the begging money for her heroin habit then it would have better demonstrated your point.</p>

<p>I think this is a low 5. You would probably get a 9 or 10.</p>

<p>I would give it a 4. I think the nature of your writing is very good, however, the ideas presented were average at best. The WWII was explained decently, while the Scam City seemed irrelevant to your argument. Maybe it is just a style thing, but generally you do not say “I” in an essay. Use words like “one”, “somebody”, or “an individual”. I thought your opening was strong. I think you could take away the word “no” in your first sentence. Just say “conscience…”</p>