<p>For #19–
You “put” questions “to” people-- just as you “put” it “to” the test. Put the idea “to” rest. She “put” me “to” shame. Put goes with “to” not “toward.”</p>
<p>Think outside the box. Loop it around. Yo.</p>
<p>For #19–
You “put” questions “to” people-- just as you “put” it “to” the test. Put the idea “to” rest. She “put” me “to” shame. Put goes with “to” not “toward.”</p>
<p>Think outside the box. Loop it around. Yo.</p>
I recognize that this is an old thread, and I apologize for reviving it. However, it does irk me to know that your question remains unanswered. I do happen to have an official answer key to the questions from the first test you posted, and although you most likely don’t care now, I will post the answers with brief explanations anyway for anyone else who happens to stumble upon this thread and is in need of the correct answers.
Hope that helps
G
Grave digging again but for #14, “Jocelyn, my friend (since) junior high school, believes she is (more well suited) to a career in the sciences (than to) the business career her parents (have urged her) to pursue”, @ColonelBoss is right. You cannot place “more” next to an adjective that already has a comparative form. The comparative form of “well” is “better”, so not only is “better suited” more concise, it is also the grammatically correct answer.
But notice I said “more concise” (XP), because “concise” does not have a comparative form (conciser?). So “more” is only used to place a word in the comparative sense if that adjective does not already have a comparative form.
the 19th question has an answer of C. The word towards" is wrong… You don’t put something towards someone, you put TO.
Sorry, the answer B.