GRE/GPA for PhD in Political Science

<p>Here is my situation:</p>

<p>I got 610 Verbal 630 Quantitative on the GRE. I have an undergrad GPA of 3.55 and a GPA in my Masters of Applied American Politics program of 3.95 (All As with one A-). I want to apply for some PhD programs in Political Science. I am not looking for anything Ivy League; my schools in order of prominence: Texas A&M, Florida State(where I will have my Masters from), University of Georgia, Georgia State and University of Houston (back-up plan). Do ya'll think I have a chance?</p>

<p>Thanks in advance.</p>

<p>I think you would have a reasonable chance at those schools based on the information you provided: the Florida State MA will look very strong on your application to those schools. Have you talked to your department about whether they accept students from the MA program into the PhD? Do you need to go through a formal application process?</p>

<p>Thanks for the reply. The only problem I have is the “Applied” in my Masters…its a non- thesis, campaign management style program. I wanted to go through this program before my doctorate to get some experience on the “other side” of campaigns, but I’m not sure how much it will help me in my doctoral admissions.</p>

<p>If you have good grades in graduate classes on your transcript, and letters from faculty in the program, it won’t hurt you. And I would guess, though I have no direct knowledge, that those test scores will make you competitive at most if not all of the schools you listed, though the quant score might be a bit on the low side. With good letters (from faculty that are known quantities) and a good SoP, you should be in decent shape.</p>

<p>Here is what I wrote for my SoP for FSU (a 500 word limit). I would be gratified if you or anyone else would be willing to give me suggestions on improvement. </p>

<p>Throughout my life, politics has been a passion. Until a few years ago, however, it was a side interest, not connected with academic study. After coming to college, however, I started to seriously
consider a career in political science, and that became my ambition. The doctoral program in political science at Florida State is an ideal avenue towards reaching my goal of becoming a political scientist. I believe that my experiences and achievements make me a solid candidate for it.</p>

<p>My particular research interest is the dynamics of American politics and elections. During my undergraduate education, I completed several quantitative papers seeking to explain voting behavior. Two of the papers were nominated for the Valdosta State University Political Science Best Paper Award. One of them (a portion of which is included in my application) attempted to discover the extent to which local political parties continue to play an important role in the electoral process. This paper was presented at the Undergraduate Research Symposium, and is currently being considered for presentation at the annual meeting of the Georgia Political Science Association. I wrote this paper not for a political research class, but rather as the summary of my internship. A second paper addressed the question of whether or not the 2008 election represented a realignment of the electorate by looking at the peculiar case of North Carolina (which voted Democratic for the first time since 1976 in the 2008 Presidential Election).</p>

<p>Because my ambition includes teaching as well as research, I have asked myself what qualities most appreciated in my professors. While there are exceptions, an important quality was experience on
“the other side,” that is experience in actual political campaigns. Because of having been there, lectures
by professors with experience tended to carry extra weight in my mind. It is for this reason that I decided to enter the Masters in Applied American Politics Program at Florida State. Through this
program and its requisite internships, I gained experience working on actual campaigns. I have phonebanked, canvassed, spoken with local party leaders, set up media appearances, and can now claim to have participated in campaigns to some extent rather than simply to have observed them.</p>

<p>I have also done well in the classroom. At the undergraduate level, I earned an “A” in every political science class with the exception of one (in which I earned a “B”). This academic success allowed
me to graduate cum laude from Valdosta State, and to become a member of the Pi Sigma Alpha Political
Science National Honor Society. While commuting from an hour and a half each day to Florida State, I thusfar have achieved a 3.95 GPA, marred only by one A-.</p>

<p>If admitted to the Florida State Doctoral program, I cannot guarantee success. What I can pledge is that I will work to the best of my ability to achieve my goal. I have come to appreciate Florida State over the past year, and the chance to earn my doctorate here would be a great honor.</p>

<p>Thank you for your consideration,</p>

<p>XX</p>

<p>This isn’t a cover letter. A statement of purpose is what it is- a proposal for your studies.</p>

<p>I take it that this is your first draft ever… you will be re-writing this at least 10 times before you’ll be satisfied with it. So don’t take my comments/suggestions too personally. With my suggestions, you’ll be (hopefully pleasantly) surprised that 500 words can be sufficient.</p>

<h1>1: The first paragraph is completely a waste of space. The first lines are cliches and tend to be in the reject pile. Professors aren’t interested in “Ever since…” or “When I was young/a child/ etc …” or “Throughout my life…” You need to come up with a different, attention grabbing line. Most applicants start off with a broad question/provoking thought.</h1>

<h1>2: While it is nice to hear why you picked FL State’s MA in Applied PS, it still doesn’t have to do anything with the PhD program. PhD is research and teach focused. No internships. You do get to do fieldwork for your dissertation and research projects but you don’t “work” in the field in a sense of obtaining an internship while in a PhD program. (Unless you totally have a summer off to do such one and your adviser doesn’t care.)</h1>

<h1>3: Don’t repeat what’s already been written in your CV or your transcript. Your space is too precious to be repeating anything that’s already obviously elsewhere. If your campaign and student activities aren’t already listed in your resume, add them in your resume now. Don’t state the obvious as you point out in the second paragraph- just make a quick note on your writing sample that it was a paper submitted for the competition and earned the title (which then should be on your CV under “Awards/Honors”). Don’t mention your GPA- it all makes you sound like a pompous person who only cares about numbers. Professors will know you’re a good student just from looking at your LORs and transcript.</h1>

<h1>4: That all said, you should have a bit more room to discuss your two papers in details- talk about your methodology, questions that you asked, and how you went about doing the research. Show the adcoms your thinking process- that’s what they’re really interested in. Bring up any thoughts or questions that you have in mind that came up during your research or in class and want to explore those while in PhD.</h1>

<h1>5: Unless specifically asked for, don’t mention your goals if not academia. It’s true for humanities, maybe not for social sciences. We just keep mum about our ambitions and stick to the conformity for the sake of maintaining professional relationships for networking and funding purposes. However, you have mentioned that these professors have had the experience, you could point out that you would benefit from their fieldwork experience. “Other side” is too colloquial and maybe… discomforting to some academics, especially to those who have never worked in the real world and don’t <em>get</em> it.</h1>

<h1>6: “Cannot guarantee success”? That’s automatic reject. You are to write with absolute positive, get-go attitude, that you WILL finish the program and graduate. Otherwise, why waste their time and money? Your “appreciation of Florida State” makes me wonder- what do you mean by that? Especially that you ARE a student there already…</h1>

<p>Go back to re-writing. There are some excellent sites (one at Berkeley, I think, if you google) out there that explains how to write a convincing SOP. With my pointers on where to delete unnecessary information, you should have more room to discuss your thoughts, problems need to be solved, hypotheses, and whatever other threads to demonstrate your intellectual ability. It’s what professors really look for.</p>

<p>Good luck!</p>

<p>^^</p>

<p>Thanks for the help. This is indeed my first-second draft.</p>

<p>Here is a new version (I pretty much started over). Hopefully this is at least marginally better:</p>

<p>Modern American politics is defined by a unique conflict. It is not the conflict between Democrats and Republicans about which I write, but rather between those that are guided by conventional wisdom and those that prefer an analytical approach to solving problems. This conflict exists in all realms of politics-from the strategy sessions of campaigns to the Halls of American universities. In this conflict, I place myself decidedly in the latter category. At every opportunity, I have tried to look beyond the conventional wisdom to the use of quantitative analysis. </p>

<p>My particular interest is American elections and electoral behavior. One of my first analytical papers was an examination of the 2008 Election results in North Carolina in an attempt to determine whether or not there was evidence of an electoral realignment. During my undergraduate internship, I noticed the heavy emphasis that the campaign I was working for placed on local county parties. My observation of these groups gave me the impression that they were weak and unimportant, and I wanted to determine whether or not the campaign’s emphasis on local parties was justified. The study I conducted was fairly rudimentary; I had to use publically available data and, rather than any sort of rating of the individual parties, I had to go with a simple “yes” or “no” as to whether or not county parties existed. My data suggested the campaign was probably not wasting it’s time, at least in the Primary season (a portion of this paper is included in my application). This paper was well received; I was able to present it at the Valdosta State Undergraduate Research Symposium, and it has been nominated for the annual meeting of the Georgia Political Science Association, but I had a desire to go deeper. Throughout the process, I came up with better ways to measure local party activity. I also wanted expand the study in a different state where Party turnout is easier to measure (Georgia has no party registration), or even on a national level. These and similar interests motivate my pursuit of a political science doctorate. </p>

<p>There are other areas beyond local parties where the conventional wisdom ought to undergo serious examination. I would like to study the impact of national-figure endorsements on election results. I would like to discover the importance of straw polls other than perhaps giving the victorious candidates an ego boost. These are issues that can be examined in an analytical manner more closely than they have to date. </p>

<p>I have been greatly impressed by the quantitative nature of the Political Science program at Florida State. I recognize that the road to a doctorate in political science will be long and tough, but I can pledge that I will work to the best of my ability to achieve my goal. I have greatly enjoyed attending Florida State over the past year, and the chance to earn my doctorate here would be a great honor.</p>

<p>Thank you for your consideration,</p>

<p>XX</p>

<p>Hi,</p>

<p>I would need your advice on getting into one of the top 10 schools in political science / international relations (Harvard, Yale, Berkeley, Stanford, etc.).</p>

<ol>
<li>master in IR from Cambridge, UK (pass)</li>
<li>valedictorian of French National School of Administration</li>
<li>6 years of work experience with the United Nations, the European Parliament and the diplomatic service</li>
<li>GRE: 560 (V) and 760 (V)</li>
<li>French national</li>
<li>co-author of several publications, including in one peer-reviewed journal on development assistance</li>
</ol>

<p>Thanks!</p>