<p>My kids' school is a large, well-known urban academic magnet. The GC's have rosters of about 450 kids @, evenly distributed among classes. Unless a kid has been in some sort of serious academic trouble, or has made a special point of meeting the GC (some do), the GC will have no idea who he or she is prior to the middle of 11th grade. The GC's do pretty much make certain to meet one-on-one with all 11th graders in the spring, and they are amenable to including parents if the scheduling works out. They will also meet with kids one-on-one at the kid's request any time, but they are busy.</p>
<p>Brag sheets are absolutely used, although they have copies of the transcripts of all students on their rosters.</p>
<p>As far as I can tell, the GC's have five functions, in descending order of importance: (1) making certain all school paperwork (including GC rec) is submitted on time to all colleges to which a student is applying, (2) making certain that every student is applying to at least one college that will probably accept him or her (i.e., for 80% of the class a second-tier in-state public college), (3) helping students (many of whom have little or no parental support for this) figure out how to fill out their applications and financial aid paperwork on time, (4) dealing with problems causing a risk of academic failure / failure to complete graduation requirements, (5) disseminating information on scholarships, external competitions, and special programs to which kids may apply, and (6) giving advice about college selection. The demands of 1-4 leave very little time for 5 (which doesn't need much) and 6. Not that they don't try some; they do. They have guides, viewbooks, etc., for students to look at, and they are happy to provide some advice if asked (often encouraging kids to look at LACs, which are not at all popular at this school, and always telling kids not to apply ED because of the need to compare finaid packages, whether or not it exists). But that isn't how they spend the bulk of their time.</p>
<p>Students in the top 20% or so of the class spend little time with their GCs. Basically, they are viewed as easy -- they are going to get into the main campus of the state u in any event, and they will probably do better for themselves, so why worry? The culture of the school tends to make them hyper aware of the admissions process. This group pretty much gets its advice in one of two ways: (1) Self-counselling, sharing information, gossip, and folklore. (2) Faculty or administration mentors (which most of these kids have, and lots of the other kids, too). Often the two combine. My D, who was a very strategic thinker about colleges and a fount of information and statistics, was given semi-formal "office hours" by a vice principal whose cult she was part of to lead an open forum on application strategy for anyone who wanted to come by his office. </p>
<p>When my son finally met with his GC last spring, he presented his tentative strategy and list of schools, and the GC basically said "Sounds great, guess you won't be needing my help, good luck and get me the paperwork as soon as you can." This was not disappointing for S: The GC was right. S is a "star" in their system and has lots of support and guidance from faculty and administrators, as well as parental support. He will get into one of the colleges on his list, and probably more than one, with adequate financial aid. Apart from shepherding paperwork, he's not a good use of the GC's time within that system.</p>
<p>EDIT: I should add that, as far as I know, the GC's have no input into course selection and non-academic discipline, which are handled by separate staffs. The Roster Office has a lot of engagement with students and basically ensures that they are taking the courses they need to graduate, and that educationally ambitious students are encouraged to apply for AP and honors classes. Both my kids had much more extensive relationships with Roster Office people than with their GC.</p>