<p>I find myself in the very fortunate position of having to pick between Harvard, MIT, Princeton, and Stanford (in alphabetical order so as not to reveal any subconscious preference). I'm pretty much equally split amongst the four, and since the enrollment postcard must be stamped and in the mailbox on Tuesday, May 1, I have decided to take a desperate drink from the fountain of wisdom known as CC :-D.</p>
<p>Background: I'm an Asian guy living in suburban Boston, about ten minutes away from Harvard and MIT, with my parents. I'm not quite sure what I want to study, but I'm leaning towards computer science/some type of engineering (I enjoy the problem solving that goes on in these fields), but I would also like to come out of college with excellent communication skills in both the written and spoken word. My main extracurricular passion is classical piano, which I play somewhere between an intermediate and an advanced level. My main academically-based interest is government and politics. I'm a political junkie who reads blogs and follows the news closely on a daily basis. I applied SCEA to Stanford and RD to the other three.</p>
<p>Here are the pros and cons that I have come up with for each school:</p>
<p>==Stanford==
Pros: Weather, really outgoing and friendly students, lots of school spirit, cheering on D1 sports teams would be fun, strong computer science & engineering, but also strong generally across the board in case I switch my mind</p>
<p>Cons: Really far away, students seemed to adopt a nonchalant attitude regarding academics (think the duck analogy), music didn't seem to be a central part of many students' extracurricular life, I'm not sure how well connected Stanford grads are along the east coast (I plan to stay in the east coast after college), boring suburban location</p>
<p>==Princeton==
Pros: Beautiful campus, lots of school spirit, strong across the board in engineering/natural sciences/humanities, classical music/performing arts in general get a lot of support from students & school alike, heavy undergraduate focus</p>
<p>Cons: typical concerns about elitism/eating clubs, boring suburban location</p>
<p>==Harvard==
Pros: Close to home, students there seemed to be the best collegiate kids in their respective fields with the exception of engineering, Boston/Cambridge is the greatest college playground, government department there is pretty much unparalleled, great music </p>
<p>Cons: Weak CS/Engineering, most students reported a negative social experience (my tour guide said it "sucked"), learning seemed to take place more as a result of the brilliance of the students than as a result of the teaching of the faculty</p>
<p>==MIT==
Pros: Noam Chomsky is the man, close to home, grueling undergraduate education ensures that you come out ready for anything (that was the impression I got), heavy student collaboration and an "us versus the professors" mentality that really prompted students to band together and form combined social/study groups, engineering/CS very very strong, Boston/Cambridge is the best college playground, I had a lot of fun during CPW, great music</p>
<p>Cons: Humanities are lacking, which I would imagine would hamper my goal to write/speak very well after college...some kids seemed to be pretty unhappy about the place, there wasn't this great institutional love like there was at Stanford, Pton, or even Harvard (IHTFP mentality)</p>
<p>I don't know why I'm posting this but just the process of writing it was very helpful. Input from current students at each institution or parents of students would be very much appreciated.</p>