<p>so this year there was a "strictly enforced" curve up at haas at the graduate and undergraduate levels. </p>
<p>the imposed curve lasted all but half a semester thanks to the riots of the students to the teachers and hence the teachers to the "deciders" and now we have some kind of pseudo-curve going on where the teachers choose the distribution as long as they "hit" the prescribed mean gpa (3.2)</p>
<p>(think instead of a bell curve, a double humped curve with peaks at A's and C's)</p>
<p>anyway, notwithstanding the foregoing, how would you feel about a Berkeley-wide curve? across every major? implying the mean GPA of historically "tough majors" and historically "easy majors" would be the forced to be the same?</p>
<p>I ask mainly because of this post (<a href="http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/13342811-post11.html%5B/url%5D">http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/13342811-post11.html</a>)</p>
<p>
...
Based on most recent (typically graduation) major, especially high majors in year 1 were: business (3.62), computer science (3.38), history (3.34), philosophy (3.34), psychology (3.33), interdisciplinary studies (3.33). Especially low majors in year 1 were: social welfare (2.89), legal studies (2.92), natural resources (2.96), math and statistics (2.96), ethnic studies and area studies (3.02), architecture (3.06). Engineering (3.15) and physical sciences (3.22) were close to average.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>anyway, just want to know how the CC forum would take this hypothetical if it were real policy. just to pass the time...</p>