<p>I suppose my old method wasn’t sufficient. I will not have 400+ posts next week though!</p>
<p>I honestly have no idea :?</p>
<p>Slightly more realistic</p>
<p>Top authors during last week:</p>
<p>Name-Posts
Wartsandall 348
Zapz 228
trumpetgrl 133
Mapleleafs26 132
maruhan2 63
quiteVALid 56
nil desperandum 52
goldysocks 46
fairy_dreams 37
QuasiProfound 36</p>
<p>o . O</p>
<p>This just showed up in the special threads, and it reminds me of when I used to be the most active for a couple weeks, and in the top list for a whole summer. Those were the days… :D</p>
<p>Well, at least I had less than 400.</p>
<p>^That’s the spirit! :D</p>
<p>^^^OMG I’ve necroed a bunch of threads you’ve posted in!</p>
<p>Top authors during last week:</p>
<p>Name - Posts
Wartsandall 370
Zapz 205
Mapleleafs26 193
trumpetgrl 165
maruhan2 84
Saugus 47
xxrunningonempty 41
fairy_dreams 38
quiteVALid 37
Blackroses216 37</p>
<p>I should work on getting less than 200.</p>
<p>^why ?</p>
<p>Why not? .</p>
<p>You first .</p>
<p>My posts represent a lack of productivity.</p>
<p>You are being productive on CC, though.</p>
<p>ouch.
what he meant is that we must all bathe in your etherial glow (per CCism)</p>
<p>then Maple waited 9 seconds, and posted again.</p>
<p>Yes, that is what I meant. =)
Thank you for clarifying that. I wish I could give +1 for that but this is not the thread for that.</p>
<p>Top authors during last week:</p>
<p>Wartsandall
252</p>
<p>Mapleleafs26
169</p>
<p>trumpetgrl
133</p>
<p>Zapz
107</p>
<p>maruhan
279</p>
<p>Saugus
46</p>
<p>fairy_dreams
41</p>
<p>xxrunningonempty
39</p>
<p>Blackroses216
37</p>
<p>I’m progressing:)</p>
<p>OMG IM #3! woah that rhymed!</p>