<p>I don't have much to add, although I think Marian and soozie may be giving Harvard a little short shrift. Basically, this may be the lowest-risk decision you ever make. They are both great schools, people love being at both of them, the students are super-great at both, their similarities far, far outweigh their differences. Don't let anyone tell you otherwise.</p>
<p>I would put it this way: Harvard, in the world of higher education, is pretty much the equivalent of Wall Street and the City of London in the financial world. That is, it's the center of the world, and everybody is conscious of that all the time. It's got the biggest, glitziest opportunities, the Most Important Projects, the most Famous People. It attracts people who are attracted to that, so it can be very competitive and a little anxious, but thrilling. Not that everyone there is competitive and/or anxious -- they aren't, or not completely -- but those qualities are much more in the air than at Brown. Even students who don't have a four-year plan to carve out their niche (yes, Harvard has some of those) sometimes feel anxious about living up to the opportunities of Harvard. That can be a little oppressive, but it can also be exhilirating, certainly, on balance, more of the latter than the former for the vast majority of students there, but something of both for all of them.</p>
<p>The thing about the Center of the World and the Most Important Projects, though, is that one person can't experience all of it, just a corner. So the actual work you do at a place like Brown is probably just as challenging, exciting, important, etc., as what you would be doing at Harvard -- there's just not quite as much glancing at the mirror and admiring yourself doing it, and less consciousness of how Extraordinary Everyone Is. As you know, it's meaningfully smaller at the undergraduate level, and about a third of Harvard's size as a university, so it's much more intimate, somewhat more LAC-like. The kids it attracts prize its lack of requirements and atmosphere of intellectual curiosity. Lots of them are indistinguishable from the kids at Harvard, of course (and some of them wish they were at Harvard, which is a little bit of a bummer), but it's safe to say that there's less of an atmosphere of competition and living up to one's opportunities, and absolutely no sense of being in the Center of the World.</p>
<p>On some detailed criteria, Harvard has some advantages you have to consider: It is far wealthier; not all of the wealth is deployed in ways that matter to undergraduates, but lots is. It is, as everyone will tell you, a stronger, more internationally recognized brand. It's also probably a more recognized brand in the house where you live; there's no risk your parents will have a stroke if you decide to go to Harvard. It's colors won't remind anyone of dog poo and are likely to look better on you. There is no more beaten path to success in the world of journalism and writing than The Crimson and The Lampoon -- but those are very competitive institutions. I think the House system at Harvard is a plus vs. Brown's dorms. Providence is much nicer than it once was, but no rational 18-year-old willing to go to school in a city would rather be there than Cambridge (except that, there being less to do, you won't feel so bad about missing so much of it, or not having the money to spend on it).</p>
<p>On the other hand, some people (me) would prefer having RISD as a neighbor to having MIT. Much better parties, more difference between the student bodies. </p>
<p>At the end of the day, though, there is absolutely no reason to believe that your bright future would be brighter in either place. You are the most important variable in that function, and you are going to be you either place. Brown is plenty big enough to challenge you, and it's full of people who will amaze and amuse you. Ditto Harvard.</p>